openjdk team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64

To: openjdk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker <329903@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:30:07 -0000
Reply-to: Bug 329903 <329903@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

This bug was fixed in the package xom - 1.1-3ubuntu4

---------------
xom (1.1-3ubuntu4) jaunty; urgency=low

  * Revert "Update default-jdk -> default-jdk-builddep to resolve FTBFS",
    gcj isn't used in this package.
  * Workaround hotspot error by using the cacao VM. LP: #329903.

 -- Matthias Klose <doko@xxxxxxxxxx>   Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:30:45 +0100

** Changed in: xom (Ubuntu)
       Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329903
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to openjdk-6 in ubuntu.

Status in Iced Tea: Confirmed
Status in “openjdk-6” source package in Ubuntu: Confirmed
Status in “xom” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released

Bug description:
xom FTBFS in Jaunty:

http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21057436/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-i386.xom_1.1-3ubuntu2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz

To solve this, it's only needed to rebuild the package (I'm setting Ubuntu Core Dev as Maintainer with my no-change patch).