openjdk team mailing list archive
-
openjdk team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01750
[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
> To provide proper integration with ubufox,
>
> 1. plugins that use update-alternatives mechanism should also put a link for their binary in
>
> /usr/share/ubufox/plugins/
> Xbb-Npp-File: libgnashplugin.so
this doesn't work for the current java plugins, which are installed
under a different name for each plugin.
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to openjdk-6 in ubuntu.
Status in “icedtea-gcjwebplugin” source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
Status in “openjdk-6” source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
Status in “sun-java5” source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
Status in “sun-java6” source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
Status in “totem” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “ubufox” source package in Ubuntu: Invalid
Bug description:
To provide proper integration with ubufox,
1. plugins that use update-alternatives mechanism should also put a link for their binary in
/usr/share/ubufox/plugins/
and touch all /usr/lib/firefox-3.*/.autoreg that exist in .postinst.
2. All plugins should have a Description and Filename header added to the binary package control, like gnash:
Xb-Npp-Description: The GNU SWF Player (http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/)
Xb-Npp-File: libgnashplugin.so
--------
When encountering a java plugin Firefox offers a confusing dialog:
it gives two options:
1. "GCJ Web Browser Plugin"
2. "The GCJ Web Browser Plugin"
the second options supposedly uses openjdk.
No descriptions are given whatsoever.