openjdk team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)

To: openjdk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Matthias Klose <doko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:33:11 -0000
Reply-to: Bug 272010 <272010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

icedtea-gcjwebplugin isn't built anymore

** Changed in: icedtea-gcjwebplugin (Ubuntu)
       Status: Triaged => Won't Fix

-- 
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to openjdk-6 in ubuntu.

Status in “icedtea-gcjwebplugin” source package in Ubuntu: Won't Fix
Status in “openjdk-6” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “sun-java5” source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
Status in “sun-java6” source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
Status in “totem” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “ubufox” source package in Ubuntu: New

Bug description:
To provide proper integration with ubufox,

1. plugins that use update-alternatives mechanism should also put a link for their binary in

 /usr/share/ubufox/plugins/

and touch all /usr/lib/firefox-3.*/.autoreg that exist in .postinst.

2. All plugins should have a Description and Filename header added to the binary package control, like gnash:

Xb-Npp-Description: The GNU SWF Player (http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/)
Xb-Npp-File: libgnashplugin.so

--------

When encountering a java plugin Firefox offers a confusing dialog:
it gives two options:
1. "GCJ Web Browser Plugin"
2. "The GCJ Web Browser Plugin"

the second options supposedly uses openjdk.

No descriptions are given whatsoever.