openjdk team mailing list archive
-
openjdk team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01789
[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
ubufox bug has been fixed.
However I see the following problems:
1. Adobe Flash Player installer does NOT work on 64 bit Ubuntu 9.04 (bug #361430).
2. (cosmetic) "Adobe Player" and "Gnash Player" using capital "P", while "Swfdec player" uses small "p".
3. (cosmetic) Adobe Flash Player URL (http://www.adobe.com) is missing a slash "/" at the end.
** Changed in: ubufox (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to openjdk-6 in ubuntu.
Status in “icedtea-gcjwebplugin” source package in Ubuntu: Won't Fix
Status in “openjdk-6” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “sun-java5” source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
Status in “sun-java6” source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
Status in “totem” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “ubufox” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Bug description:
To provide proper integration with ubufox,
1. plugins that use update-alternatives mechanism should also put a link for their binary in
/usr/share/ubufox/plugins/
and touch all /usr/lib/firefox-3.*/.autoreg that exist in .postinst.
2. All plugins should have a Description and Filename header added to the binary package control, like gnash:
Xb-Npp-Description: The GNU SWF Player (http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/)
Xb-Npp-File: libgnashplugin.so
--------
When encountering a java plugin Firefox offers a confusing dialog:
it gives two options:
1. "GCJ Web Browser Plugin"
2. "The GCJ Web Browser Plugin"
the second options supposedly uses openjdk.
No descriptions are given whatsoever.