openjdk team mailing list archive
-
openjdk team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01803
[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
Alexander,
On upto date Jaunty as of today Icedtea (1st entry) installs correctly - only other entry now shown is Java SE - haven't tried that one yet.
So yeh, that seems happier.
(IcedTea is a bit flaky - found some 100% java processes left over afterwards - but that's separate I guess).
Dave
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to openjdk-6 in ubuntu.
Status in “icedtea-gcjwebplugin” source package in Ubuntu: Won't Fix
Status in “openjdk-6” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “sun-java5” source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
Status in “sun-java6” source package in Ubuntu: Triaged
Status in “totem” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “ubufox” source package in Ubuntu: New
Bug description:
To provide proper integration with ubufox,
1. plugins that use update-alternatives mechanism should also put a link for their binary in
/usr/share/ubufox/plugins/
and touch all /usr/lib/firefox-3.*/.autoreg that exist in .postinst.
2. All plugins should have a Description and Filename header added to the binary package control, like gnash:
Xb-Npp-Description: The GNU SWF Player (http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/)
Xb-Npp-File: libgnashplugin.so
--------
When encountering a java plugin Firefox offers a confusing dialog:
it gives two options:
1. "GCJ Web Browser Plugin"
2. "The GCJ Web Browser Plugin"
the second options supposedly uses openjdk.
No descriptions are given whatsoever.