← Back to team overview

openjdk team mailing list archive

Re: [Bug 518948] Re: Default Java paths aren't set up by default

 

ons, 10 02 2010 kl. 08:13 +0000, skrev Thierry Carrez:
> I think there is a bit of misunderstanding here.

Okay, I see (definitely not the behaviour I would have expected,
though).

Is it also on purpose that 'sudo update-java-alternatives -s java-6-sun'
does _not_ create the link '/usr/lib/jvm/default-java' unless
'default-jdk' happens to be installed?

Søren

-- 
Default Java paths aren't set up by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518948
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to openjdk-6 in ubuntu.

Status in “openjdk-6” package in Ubuntu: Invalid
Status in “sun-java6” package in Ubuntu: Invalid

Bug description:
I did not file this bug against a package as it seems to be more like an infra-structure problem.

If I install the Sun Java Developer Kit ('sun-java6-jdk') it gets installed in '/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun'. Most 3rd party applications look for this in '/usr/lib/jvm/default-java'. The standard solution is to create a symbolic link from  '/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun'  to  '/usr/lib/jvm/default-java'. This is, however, not done automatically unless I install the 'default-jdk' package which installs the 'openjdk-6-jdk' package. So, if I only want the Sun JDK I have to manually create the symlink. This link does not seem to be create by 'sudo update-java-alternatives -s java-6-sun' unless I install the 'default-jdk' package.

Okay, this description was a bit convoluted, but the problem itself seems to be rather convoluted. I would have expected the following behavior:

  * When I install _any_ JDK the corresponding  '/usr/lib/jvm/default-java' if it does not already exist.

  * When I run 'sudo update-java-alternatives -s java-6-sun' I would expect  '/usr/lib/jvm/default-java' to be created even if I don't have the 'default-jdk' package installed.





References