openjdk team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

[Bug 272010] Re: Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)

To: openjdk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker <272010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:57:44 -0000
Reply-to: Bug 272010 <272010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/totem

-- 
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to openjdk-6 in ubuntu.

Status in “icedtea-gcjwebplugin” package in Ubuntu: Won't Fix
Status in “openjdk-6” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “sun-java5” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “sun-java6” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “totem” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “ubufox” package in Ubuntu: New

Bug description:
To provide proper integration with ubufox,

1. plugins that use update-alternatives mechanism should also put a link for their binary in

 /usr/share/ubufox/plugins/

and touch all /usr/lib/firefox-3.*/.autoreg that exist in .postinst.

2. All plugins should have a Description and Filename header added to the binary package control, like gnash:

Xb-Npp-Description: The GNU SWF Player (http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/)
Xb-Npp-File: libgnashplugin.so

--------

When encountering a java plugin Firefox offers a confusing dialog:
it gives two options:
1. "GCJ Web Browser Plugin"
2. "The GCJ Web Browser Plugin"

the second options supposedly uses openjdk.

No descriptions are given whatsoever.