openjdk team mailing list archive

[Jamie Strandboge <jamie@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I looked into oneiric and all of the binaries except openjdk-6-jre-zero
are superseded by the openjdk-6 binaries. openjdk-6 does provide this
package. Steve, can you comment on what is going on here?

Regardless of what is happening with openjdk-6-jre-zero, it's in
universe and since all the other binaries are superseded, we can
probably just mark this as "Won't Fix".

** Changed in: openjdk-6b18 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
       Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to openjdk-6b18 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881834

Title:
  Please remove openjdk-6b18 source from precise, oneiric

Status in “openjdk-6b18” package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in “openjdk-6b18” source package in Oneiric:
  Incomplete
Status in “openjdk-6b18” source package in Precise:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  The openjdk-6b18 source package was introduced in earlier releases
  specifically for the armel architecture because the newer releases of
  openjdk/icedtea 6 were failing to build on armel. The binary packages
  provided by the openjdk-6b18 are a subset of the same named packages
  provided by the openjdk-6 package, just with an earlier version.

   In precise and oneiric, the version icedtea-6 has been fixed to allow
  it to build (and works) on armel, and thus the binary packages from
  the openjdk-6b18 source are superceded by the packages from the
  openjdk-6 6b23 source. Furthermore, the openjdk-6b18 package FTBFS on
  oneiric and precise. These source packages should be pulled, at a
  minimum from precise, and probably from oneiric as well (if possible).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6b18/+bug/881834/+subscriptions