openjdk team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

Bug#675495: openjdk maintenance for wheezy and squeeze

To: Thijs Kinkhorst <thijs@xxxxxxxxxx>, 675495@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 14:44:52 +0100
Cc: debian-java@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, debian-release@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <201303031408.49053.thijs@debian.org>
Reply-to: Julien Cristau <jcristau@xxxxxxxxxx>, 675495@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Resent-cc: OpenJDK Team <openjdk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 13:48:01 +0000
Resent-from: Julien Cristau <jcristau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-message-id: <handler.675495.B675495.13623182987374@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-sender: Debian BTS <debbugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-to: debian-bugs-dist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Control: retitle -1 openjdk-6 should not be released with jessie
Control: tag -1 + wheezy-ignore

On Sun, Mar  3, 2013 at 14:08:44 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:

> Op donderdag 28 februari 2013 21:35:09 schreef Moritz Mühlenhoff:
> > So we should proceed with providing backports for openjdk in the future.
> > 
> > If Matthias keeps the Debian/Ubuntu packaging in a state that it's easily
> > buildable on squeeze/wheezy for ojdk6 and for wheezy on ojdk7 I think
> > we should be able to handle Java updates resource-wise.
> 
> So it seems we are in agreement that it's not feasible to remove OpenJDK-6 
> from Wheezy, and there's the expectation that it can be supported in a 
> relatively acceptable way.
> 
> Perhaps the RT can tag #675495 wheezy-ignore (and retitle). I'm pretty sure we 
> don't want OpenJDK-6 in Jessie.
> 
Alright.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature