openjdk team mailing list archive
-
openjdk team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #10283
Re: xulrunner-dev is gone
-
To:
Mike Hommey <mh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4r8o@xxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:26:17 -0000
-
Cc:
libreoffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mozilla-gnome-keyring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, openvrml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gnash@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stylish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, spice-xpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, npapi-vlc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gecko-mediaplayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, icedtea-web@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gnome-chemistry-utils@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, packagekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
Delivered-to:
icedtea-web@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
In-reply-to:
<20140611024717.GA5412@glandium.org>
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:47 AM, Mike Hommey <mh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I just uploaded iceweasel 30 to unstable, which is the first version not
> to provide xulrunner-dev. Instead, there is an iceweasel-dev package,
> and it most certainly has things missing. Read: I *know* there are
> things missing. I just don't know what specifically reverse build deps
> would need.
>
> This is where I need your assistance: could you try building your
> packages against iceweasel-dev and see what they are bugging about?
> Please file bugs against iceweasel-dev for anything missing you'd
> encounter.
At the moment gnash expects npapi.h under /usr/include/xulrunner*
dirs. Fixable by making it look for it also under
/usr/include/iceweasel*. Will ubuntu move headers to /u/i/firefox*?
How about linking /u/i/xulrunner -> /u/i/iceweasel-N instead?
BTW would packaging npapi-sdk still be a good alternative?
https://bugs.debian.org/642168
--
G..e
Follow ups
References