openjdk team mailing list archive
-
openjdk team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #10932
[Bug 1438575] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla
------- Comment From tdaitx@xxxxxxxxxx 2015-04-28 03:57 EDT-------
Just a quick update to let you know that IcedTea 2.6 release should happen in a month or so according to its maintainer.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to openjdk-7 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1438575
Title:
OpenJdk 7 and OpenJdk 8 miss-report the os.arch field and cause java
apps to crash.
Status in openjdk-7 package in Ubuntu:
Incomplete
Status in openjdk-8 package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
Problem Description
=======================================
OpenJdk 7 and OpenJdk 8 miss report the os.arch field and cause java apps to crash.
When we run under OpenJDK on a ubuntu ppc64el system the os.arch
system properites gets reported as ppc64.
This causes multiple java libraries to load the wrong native
architecture modules as it thinks this is a big endian machine, rather
than a ppc64le machine.
---uname output---
Linux tulgpu002 3.16.0-30-generic #40-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jan 12 22:07:11 UTC 2015 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux
Machine Type = 8247-42L
Steps to Reproduce
===================================================
make sure an openjdk is installed.
sudo apt-get install openjdk-7-jdk
Create a very simple java properties dumper.
cat >sysprop.java <<EOF
class sysprop{
public static void main(String[] args){
System.getProperties().list(System.out);
}
}
EOF
and run it and look for the os.arch output.
javac sysprop.java
ralphbel@tulgpu002:~/java$ java sysprop | grep arch
os.arch=ppc64
sun.arch.data.model=64
== Comment: #2 - Ralph E. Bellofatto <ralphbel@xxxxxxxxxx> - 2015-03-17 05:39:29 ==
Acutally this is ubuntu 14.10.
ralphbel@tulgpu002:~/java$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 14.10
Release: 14.10
Codename: utopic
I suspect this problem also exists on the ubuntu 14.04 releases
although we have not tried that yet...
== Comment: #3 - Ralph E. Bellofatto <ralphbel@xxxxxxxxxx> - 2015-03-17 05:51:04 ==
more information on the package we are using:
ralphbel@tulgpu002:~/jnr-ffi$ apt-cache policy openjdk-7-jdk
openjdk-7-jdk:
Installed: 7u75-2.5.4-1~utopic1
and
ralphbel@tulgpu002:~/jnr-ffi$ apt-cache policy openjdk-8-jdk
openjdk-8-jdk:
Installed: 8u40~b09-1
== Comment: #4 - Ralph E. Bellofatto <ralphbel@xxxxxxxxxx> - 2015-03-18 15:04:51 ==
This is an interesting comment in the openJDK bugs database:
****************************
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073139
****************************
apparently there was a decision to NOT give the architecture a unique
name, and that is inconstant with other JDK/JRE's, and it breaks a LOT
of code.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-7/+bug/1438575/+subscriptions