openjdk team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

Bug#920020: Bug#920020: javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module

To: Matthias Klose <doko@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:01:44 +0100 (CET)
Cc: 920020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <defbd4f3-5ab5-97d4-eef0-7a09fb7e6bed@ubuntu.com>
Reply-to: Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@xxxxxxxxx>, 920020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Resent-cc: OpenJDK Team <openjdk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 23:03:17 +0000
Resent-from: Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@xxxxxxxxx>
Resent-message-id: <handler.920020.B920020.154811170812693@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-to: debian-bugs-dist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)

On Mon, 21 Jan 2019, Matthias Klose wrote:

> no, why are you exaggerating? Both the jre and the jdk are usable.

The javadoc tool isn’t, and this breaks all builds.

I’ve enacted the workaround in the meantime, even if this
goes against the documented javadoc options…

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
tarent solutions GmbH
Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/
Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235
HRB 5168 (AG Bonn) • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg

References

Bug#920020: javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module
From: Thorsten Glaser, 2019-01-21
Bug#920020: Bug#920020: javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module
From: Matthias Klose, 2019-01-21