openjdk team mailing list archive
-
openjdk team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #13576
Bug#900912: "AtkWrapper not found" error impacting JOSM on Ubuntu/Mint
-
To:
Samuel Thibault <sthibault@xxxxxxxxxx>, Matthias Klose <doko@xxxxxxxxxx>, Vincent Privat <vincent@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 900912@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Debian Java <debian-java@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, josm-dev <josm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny@xxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Paul Gevers <elbrus@xxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Sat, 6 Apr 2019 15:13:55 +0200
-
Autocrypt:
addr=elbrus@xxxxxxxxxx; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQENBE2LmVYBCADS6vA01KutEM74dDGrsmT2q6Mh5C3TAyNhLigBEWNGnfbFr6AHX1EvdkC/ 7g5QcFGqiiOjTdHncRNtvUbistfbF1ynE6evD3p5tpkn6ymmVwSIjx9np7GWJgZgBo0zkpij M1iimHTs1BcZhL7WQlvVJO3Xm8jr7NpgjkRRkkPaj0Kd/HYuPGqN74pwXB7nR5Uw2ypYS0eT iCHUUTUrvgP3fqOWc2bgbCIsuoXpp/QLT5ehC+M01UKMHVUkr97cwT4wg03XqE2cL7r6szry GZMpL3CU4IsPNghfeZhRrZlk6A73OtpLxTXibydt8Og91eC2ALer28bJnn+haIaTNwc3ABEB AAG0H1BhdWwgR2V2ZXJzIDxlbGJydXNAZGViaWFuLm9yZz6JAVcEEwEIAEECGyMFCwkIBwMF FQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4ACGQEWIQRYtm1Ic2vpOwUt5nKcXJnrBb11CgUCXHRFuQUJEqsT YwAKCRCcXJnrBb11CgycB/9Kl9K85cXLGo5PJ0a4oiq53kOTuzlmFPRedMhwECQ+JrFigLe2 DH1ZhLpepzQ5Bszq5vMbiqK6Ek5yKH6NYp7ktPYQaFsqNybPaaNkkj/i1pGlnpYESuliiLQG Scj9+oGd8mD4cF1VWboLuAESW2lr2bJs3ln/7bt9CNhgKZ5h6zMJ+0ZaSjbjpv3eKu6WTquT c+/p5sU4m0WE/FSkg28SvWEcyqTuVvs63CT/CK9xeAmUaMKf18qrKX1AURyn6nf+Aqs11ATD EeTmGW08VvKSlVVrR0HLSyTOOQxEV99upobhOm2Ml4an9RrSJS1LUiEYR5QMvvDR3VJ+W6KQ GW/OuQENBE2LmVYBCAC6ZRwRIuJ2l2FYLd5/URSgkTSfwANnXWBpNOVYhuGrvveA0e9KrToI pqZCRjrAiuaW4aaQq8dwYZpCMJhq3VzVW0C0BA7QARrePEQfJXkNiHyYEoJrmt21zQO8KP1m d13TtX1jj/Sqt2Y4efbKKZ2VeWwngsgXOwCTVyj7tth6fwn+5bPptxp/Ux4CXD5G4XvGTGfR pEa61sfvh6NEZTbe/7gGFEOBSat7esVAj170NVc4V8HX+/NtlJrlEce6BMbCvug5vF4iGkMY NwbdzFu2+rB+w9Dmo262lnWtUYQpX1nnmbWS8nU7ygCcKd/xc08xYCu1gt69YHp7yOqK2Nr3 ABEBAAGJATwEGAEIACYCGwwWIQRYtm1Ic2vpOwUt5nKcXJnrBb11CgUCXHRFvwUJEqsTaQAK CRCcXJnrBb11ChElB/wJvGm3rOIuUpd1TQaCT1TGr2YHCF23+WnLfndjaBLgCaAyChfv20b1 cslCZvswy6UwTX9AvksiIZhfWE5GHXTxk1Z02bwqTWagtPTr5HBIdSGf9m1abrqknl0B50Kr wWLe9U80ch2atix0qq1nW/R9/2O3/wledNk45bEb8JzxBctMnPYMzIf53zy0hEoCLf3hm6AS vUmMd0+OFk3kUwb9S/k8jjdIw1PBi/ukexqipuUzLX9YYDlNsDLp5M9vgDQDJWfrCFbSkr4G /EEo4yh4uhWIU5rSrvrtKEQZYtXrm5x996qn79m/9CPZJarUK4PHnaN0iE+D168Yblay+e6R
-
In-reply-to:
<20190406065539.lw3peamhpvo7mzc6@function>
-
Openpgp:
preference=signencrypt
-
Reply-to:
Paul Gevers <elbrus@xxxxxxxxxx>, 900912@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
Resent-cc:
OpenJDK Team <openjdk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
Resent-date:
Sat, 06 Apr 2019 13:18:04 +0000
-
Resent-from:
Paul Gevers <elbrus@xxxxxxxxxx>
-
Resent-message-id:
<handler.900912.B900912.155455644218473@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
Resent-to:
debian-bugs-dist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1
Hi
On 06-04-2019 08:55, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> please don't NMU. In the past the atk patches broke the non-atk use case way too
>> often. Maybe you want to upload to a PPA or to experimental to give this a
>> little bit more testing.
>
> Can we then at least upload all changes except enabling atk, i.e.
> the attached patch which just fixes loading atk without enabling it
> by default? So that there is even no need for any external PPA or
> experimental (which would be quite involved for people to configure),
> instead people can just enable from the configuration file, as expected
> and documented.
With my release team member hat on: we want accessibility enabled by
default. We're late already, I would want this rather sooner than latter
in buster, such that there is some real live testing before we release.
Sure, there are chances for bugs, but if that's the case, let's find
them and fix them.
Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Follow ups
References