opensand team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

Re: Secured ULE

To: Jussi Isokangas <jussi.t.isokangas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Julien BERNARD <jbernard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:07:21 +0200
Cc: "opensand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <opensand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAH5fdj_6HvZZzkucMt32b46MQ-NZPzcEXsxJzb-warEidrKyrw@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0

Hi Jussi,

I'm finsihing my thesis work and try to test Opensand with secure Ule.
I have tried (I'm new with C++) to figure out of code. There iscreated new instance of UleSecurity in Ule.cpp so any separate GUI-components is not needed for that?


You shouldn't need anything else.
But why didn't you use the existing UleExtSecurity code ?

UleSecure.cpp includes important header (payloadtype) for secure Ule.Optional headers (PN and MAC is not included) There are too codingand decoding functions in UleSecurity. What is the problem with security?


I don't understand your question.
Maybe you should read this paper:
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4656783&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D4656783

Regards,

--
Julien BERNARD

References

Secured ULE
From: Jussi Isokangas, 2014-04-08
Re: Secured ULE
From: Julien BERNARD, 2014-04-08
Re: Secured ULE
From: Jussi Isokangas, 2014-06-23