openshot.developers team mailing list archive

[TJ <ubuntu@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 17:01 -0500, Jonathan Thomas wrote:
> I'm writing an article on the PPA, and there are 2 different PPAs that
> contain OpenShot (as you know).
> 
> A) https://launchpad.net/~intuitivenipple/+archive/video-editors
> B) https://launchpad.net/~openshot.developers/+archive/ppa
> 
> So, B is updated more frequently, correct?  And A is the more stable
> (less frequently updated) version?

No, if anything my own video-editors PPA is more bleeding-edge. Its
purpose is to contain any and all video editing packages and supporting
libraries I'm experimenting with, because I usually want the most recent
from the project's VCS.

> Should I discuss both, and let people decide which version they want? 

No, only mention the OpenShot PPA.

>  Or should we always recommend one over the other one?  Any thoughts?

There is no need to mention my own PPA. Once I have good builds of
packages that OpenShot requires I do a binary-package copy from my PPA
to the OpenShot PPA so that everything OpenShot requires is available
from its own archive.
This saves on uploading and building the same source in two PPAs.