openstack-poc team mailing list archive

1. openstack-poc team
2. Mailing list archive
3. Messages by date

Messages by date

Messages sent to the openstack-poc mailing list, ordered by date from the newest to oldest.

• Re: Technical Committee bios
  From: Lauren Sell, 2012-09-19
• Re: Technical Committee bios
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-09-19
• Technical Committee bios
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-09-18
• Re: User Committee appointee
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-09-16
• Re: User Committee appointee
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-09-11
• Re: User Committee appointee
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-09-11
• Re: User Committee appointee
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-09-11
• Re: User Committee appointee
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-09-11
• Re: User Committee appointee
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-09-11
• Re: User Committee appointee
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-09-11
• Re: User Committee appointee
  From: Brian Waldon, 2012-09-11
• User Committee appointee
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-09-10
• Re: Next meeting: proposal to get openstack-common a proper PTL
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-08-07
• Re: Next meeting: proposal to get openstack-common a proper PTL
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-08-07
• Fwd: [Openstack] Heat application for incubation
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-08-07
• Re: Next meeting: proposal to get openstack-common a proper PTL
  From: John Purrier, 2012-08-06
• Re: Next meeting: proposal to get openstack-common a proper PTL
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-08-06
• Next meeting: proposal to get openstack-common a proper PTL
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-08-03
• Supporting projects definition
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-07-27
• Re: Meeting tomorrow
  From: Brian Waldon, 2012-07-23
• Meeting tomorrow
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-07-23
• Re: [Openstack] Heat application for incubation
  From: Jay Pipes, 2012-07-16
• Meeting tomorrow
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-07-09
• Re: [Openstack] Ceilometer application for incubation
  From: Julien Danjou, 2012-07-06
• Re: [Openstack] Ceilometer application for incubation
  From: Doug Hellmann, 2012-07-06
• Re: [Openstack] Ceilometer application for incubation
  From: Nick Barcet, 2012-07-06
• Re: [Openstack] Ceilometer application for incubation
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-07-05
• Ceilometer application for incubation
  From: Nick Barcet, 2012-07-05
• Re: Tomorrow's meeting
  From: Brian Waldon, 2012-07-02
• Re: Tomorrow's meeting
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-07-02
• Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Technical Committee: new draft
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-06-27
• Technical Committee: new draft
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-06-27
• Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Technical Committee: reserved seats for PTLs (or not)
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-06-26
• Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Technical Committee: reserved seats for PTLs (or not)
  From: Dallas Kashuba, 2012-06-26
• Tomorrow's meeting
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-06-26
• Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Technical Committee: reserved seats for PTLs (or not)
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-06-25
• Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Technical Committee: reserved seats for PTLs (or not)
  From: Randy Bias, 2012-06-24
• Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Technical Committee: reserved seats for PTLs (or not)
  From: Jan Drake, 2012-06-24
• Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Technical Committee: reserved seats for PTLs (or not)
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-06-23
• Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Technical Committee: reserved seats for PTLs (or not)
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-06-23
• Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Technical Committee: reserved seats for PTLs (or not)
  From: Jan Drake, 2012-06-23
• Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Technical Committee: reserved seats for PTLs (or not)
  From: Justin Santa Barbara, 2012-06-23
• Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Technical Committee: reserved seats for PTLs (or not)
  From: Jan Drake, 2012-06-23
• Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Technical Committee: reserved seats for PTLs (or not)
  From: Justin Santa Barbara, 2012-06-22
• Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Technical Committee: reserved seats for PTLs (or not)
  From: Joe Heck, 2012-06-22
• Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Technical Committee: reserved seats for PTLs (or not)
  From: Justin Santa Barbara, 2012-06-22
• Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Technical Committee: reserved seats for PTLs (or not)
  From: Jan Drake, 2012-06-22
• Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Technical Committee: reserved seats for PTLs (or not)
  From: Joe Heck, 2012-06-22
• Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Technical Committee: reserved seats for PTLs (or not)
  From: Doug Hellmann, 2012-06-20
• Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Technical Committee: reserved seats for PTLs (or not)
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-06-20
• Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Technical Committee: reserved seats for PTLs (or not)
  From: Doug Hellmann, 2012-06-20
• Re: [OpenStack Foundation] Technical Committee: reserved seats for PTLs (or not)
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-06-20
• Technical Committee: reserved seats for PTLs (or not)
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-06-20
• Re: [Openstack] Thoughts on client library releasing
  From: Gabriel Hurley, 2012-06-19
• Re: [Openstack] Thoughts on client library releasing
  From: Doug Hellmann, 2012-06-18
• Re: Thoughts on client library releasing
  From: Monty Taylor, 2012-06-18
• Re: [Openstack] Thoughts on client library releasing
  From: Monty Taylor, 2012-06-18
• Re: Thoughts on client library releasing
  From: Joe Heck, 2012-06-18
• Re: [Openstack] Thoughts on client library releasing
  From: Doug Hellmann, 2012-06-18
• Thoughts on client library releasing
  From: Monty Taylor, 2012-06-18
• Re: Proposed agenda item for tomorrow's meeting
  From: Monty Taylor, 2012-06-18
• Re: Proposed agenda item for tomorrow's meeting
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-06-18
• Library Project Definition
  From: Brian Waldon, 2012-06-12
• Proposed agenda item for tomorrow's meeting
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-06-11
• No meeting today
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-05-29
• Meeting today
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-05-22
• Re: Completeness of core
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-05-14
• Completeness of core
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-05-10
• openstack-poc deactivated by markmc
  From: OpenStack Common Drivers, 2012-05-09
• Re: openstack-common bug spam
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-05-09
• Re: openstack-common bug spam
  From: Jay Pipes, 2012-05-08
• Re: openstack-common bug spam
  From: Joe Heck, 2012-05-08
• Re: [Openstack] 3rd Party APIs
  From: Alan Sill, 2012-05-08
• Re: [Openstack] 3rd Party APIs
  From: Doug Davis, 2012-05-08
• Fwd: Re: [Openstack] 3rd Party APIs
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-05-08
• Re: 3rd Party APIs
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-05-08
• openstack-common bug spam
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-05-08
• Re: Meeting tomorrow
  From: Jesse Andrews, 2012-05-07
• Re: Meeting tomorrow
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-05-07
• [Bug 994957] Re: handle all mailmap with name and email address
  From: Brian Waldon, 2012-05-07
• Meeting tomorrow
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-05-07
• Re: 3rd Party APIs
  From: Joe Heck, 2012-05-07
• Re: 3rd Party APIs
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-05-07
• [Bug 994957] Re: handle all mailmap with name and email address
  From: Bhuvaneswaran A, 2012-05-07
• [Bug 994957] Re: handle all mailmap with name and email address
  From: OpenStack Hudson, 2012-05-07
• [Bug 994957] Re: handle all mailmap with name and email address
  From: OpenStack Hudson, 2012-05-06
• [Bug 994957] Re: handle all mailmap with name and email address
  From: OpenStack Hudson, 2012-05-06
• [Bug 994957] Re: handle all mailmap with name and email address
  From: Bhuvaneswaran A, 2012-05-06
• Re: 3rd Party APIs
  From: Joe Heck, 2012-05-06
• Re: 3rd Party APIs
  From: Jay Pipes, 2012-05-06
• Re: 3rd Party APIs
  From: John Dickinson, 2012-05-06
• Re: 3rd Party APIs
  From: Joe Heck, 2012-05-05
• [Bug 994957] Re: handle all mailmap with name and email address
  From: Joseph Heck, 2012-05-05
• [Bug 994957] Re: handle all mailmap with name and email address
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-05-05
• [Bug 994957] Re: handle all mailmap with name and email address
  From: Bhuvaneswaran A, 2012-05-05
• [Bug 994957] [NEW] handle all mailmap with name and email address
  From: Bhuvaneswaran A, 2012-05-05
• [Bug 943336] Re: New requirements never get written out
  From: Jason Kölker, 2012-05-04
• Re: [Bug 943336] Re: New requirements never get written out
  From: Monty Taylor, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 976267] Re: auto generate AUTHORS for packaging
  From: Bhuvaneswaran A, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 976267] Re: auto generate AUTHORS for packaging
  From: Bhuvaneswaran A, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 943336] Re: New requirements never get written out
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 976267] Re: auto generate AUTHORS for packaging
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 976267] Re: auto generate AUTHORS for packaging
  From: Bhuvaneswaran A, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 965563] Re: Usability issue: is_public=yes sets Public: No
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 967400] Re: iniparser needs absolute import
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 967808] Re: Create common __init__
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 972859] Re: Fix utils.import_object() when trying to get an instance of a class
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 976267] Re: auto generate AUTHORS for packaging
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 960487] Re: Request deserializer does not pass an empty body
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 963509] Re: update.py doesn't handle dependencies of configured modules
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 951197] Re: openstack namespace does not play nicely with checkedout repos
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 954488] Re: nova/openstack/common/cfg.py: 'nova.api.openstack.contrib.standard_extensions' is non-existant
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 955308] Re: MultiStrOpt doesn't always accept multiple strings
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 930270] Re: flagfile interpolation breaks instance_name_template
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 930625] Re: PEP8 cleanup (openstack-common)
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 947861] Re: cfg: automatically create option groups
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 627792] Re: Support getting a logger
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 915039] Re: flags.FLAGS( crashes bpython
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 925775] Re: utils.import_object sometimes masks the failed import
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 927650] Re: cfg: unneeded multiple inheritance
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 946573] Re: 404 handler for doc sites
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-05-04
• Re: 3rd Party APIs
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-05-04
• Fwd: 3rd Party APIs
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 976267] Re: auto generate AUTHORS for packaging
  From: Bhuvaneswaran A, 2012-05-04
• [Bug 976267] [NEW] auto generate AUTHORS for packaging
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-05-04
• Re: 3rd Party APIs
  From: John Dickinson, 2012-05-03
• [Bug 983734] Re: Keystone fails badly if you miss one option
  From: OpenStack Hudson, 2012-05-03
• Re: 3rd Party APIs
  From: Devin Carlen, 2012-05-03
• Re: 3rd Party APIs
  From: Jay Pipes, 2012-05-03
• Re: 3rd Party APIs
  From: Brian Waldon, 2012-05-03
• Re: 3rd Party APIs
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-05-03
• Re: 3rd Party APIs
  From: Joshua McKenty, 2012-05-03
• 3rd Party APIs
  From: Vishvananda Ishaya, 2012-05-02
• [Bug 983734] Re: Keystone fails badly if you miss one option
  From: Yuriy Taraday, 2012-04-26
• [Bug 983734] Re: Keystone fails badly if you miss one option
  From: Doug Hellmann, 2012-04-26
• [Bug 988354] Re: python-novaclient is sending wrong URL for volumes and volume-snapshots
  From: Vish Ishaya, 2012-04-25
• [Bug 988354] [NEW] python-novaclient is sending wrong URL for volumes and volume-snapshots
  From: Rajalakshmi Ganesan, 2012-04-25
• [Bug 983734] Re: Keystone fails badly if you miss one option
  From: Monty Taylor, 2012-04-25
• [Bug 983734] Re: Keystone fails badly if you miss one option
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-04-25
• [Bug 983734] Re: Keystone fails badly if you miss one option
  From: Yuriy Taraday, 2012-04-25
• [Bug 983734] Re: Keystone fails badly if you miss one option
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-04-24
• [Bug 983734] Re: Keystone fails badly if you miss one option
  From: Yuriy Taraday, 2012-04-24
• [Bug 983734] Re: Keystone fails badly if you miss one option
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-04-24
• [Bug 983734] Re: Keystone fails badly if you miss one option
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-04-24
• Re: Meeting Tomorrow
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-04-24
• Re: Meeting Tomorrow
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-04-24
• Meeting Tomorrow
  From: Vishvananda Ishaya, 2012-04-24
• [Bug 951197] Re: openstack namespace does not play nicely with checkedout repos
  From: Bhuvaneswaran A, 2012-04-21
• Re: Meeting?!
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-04-18
• Meeting?!
  From: Joshua McKenty, 2012-04-18
• [Bug 972859] Re: Fix utils.import_object() when trying to get an instance of a class
  From: OpenStack Hudson, 2012-04-11
• Fwd: satellite website domain request proposal
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-04-10
• Re: Meeting tomorrow
  From: John Dickinson, 2012-04-10
• Re: Meeting tomorrow
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-04-10
• Re: Meeting tomorrow
  From: Jay Pipes, 2012-04-09
• Re: Meeting tomorrow
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-04-09
• Re: Meeting tomorrow
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-04-09
• Re: Meeting tomorrow
  From: Joe Heck, 2012-04-09
• Re: Meeting tomorrow
  From: Jay Pipes, 2012-04-09
• Meeting tomorrow
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-04-09
• [Bug 954488] Re: nova/openstack/common/cfg.py: 'nova.api.openstack.contrib.standard_extensions' is non-existant
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-04-05
• [Bug 930270] Re: flagfile interpolation breaks instance_name_template
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-04-05
• [Bug 915039] Re: flags.FLAGS( crashes bpython
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-04-05
• [Bug 965563] Re: Usability issue: is_public=yes sets Public: No
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-04-05
• [Bug 954488] Re: nova/openstack/common/cfg.py: 'nova.api.openstack.contrib.standard_extensions' is non-existant
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-04-04
• [Bug 960487] Re: Request deserializer does not pass an empty body
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-04-04
• [Bug 972859] Re: Fix utils.import_object() when trying to get an instance of a class
  From: OpenStack Hudson, 2012-04-03
• [Bug 972859] [NEW] Fix utils.import_object() when trying to get an instance of a class
  From: Russell Bryant, 2012-04-03
• Fwd: [Openstack] OpenStack Java SDK First Snapshot
  From: Luis Gervaso, 2012-04-03
• [Bug 967808] Re: Create common __init__
  From: OpenStack Hudson, 2012-03-28
• [Bug 967808] Fix proposed to openstack-common (master)
  From: OpenStack Hudson, 2012-03-28
• [Bug 967808] [NEW] Create common __init__
  From: Rick Harris, 2012-03-28
• satellite website domain request proposal
  From: Marton Kiss, 2012-03-28
• [Bug 965563] Re: Usability issue: is_public=yes sets Public: No
  From: OpenStack Hudson, 2012-03-28
• [Bug 967400] Re: iniparser needs absolute import
  From: OpenStack Hudson, 2012-03-28
• [Bug 967400] Fix proposed to openstack-common (master)
  From: OpenStack Hudson, 2012-03-28
• [Bug 967400] [NEW] iniparser needs absolute import
  From: Rick Harris, 2012-03-28
• [Bug 965563] Re: Usability issue: is_public=yes sets Public: No
  From: Sean Dague, 2012-03-28
• Meeting tomorrow
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-03-26
• [Bug 963509] [NEW] update.py doesn't handle dependencies of configured modules
  From: Johannes Erdfelt, 2012-03-23
• [Bug 951197] Re: openstack namespace does not play nicely with checkedout repos
  From: Johannes Erdfelt, 2012-03-23
• [Bug 955308] Re: MultiStrOpt doesn't always accept multiple strings
  From: OpenStack Hudson, 2012-03-22
• [Bug 960487] Re: Request deserializer does not pass an empty body
  From: cp16net, 2012-03-20
• [Bug 960487] Re: Request deserializer does not pass an empty body
  From: OpenStack Hudson, 2012-03-20
• [Bug 960487] [NEW] Request deserializer does not pass an empty body
  From: cp16net, 2012-03-20
• [Bug 954488] Re: nova/openstack/common/cfg.py: 'nova.api.openstack.contrib.standard_extensions' is non-existant
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-03-20
• Update on the Design Summit - March 19
  From: Stefano Maffulli, 2012-03-19
• [Bug 955308] Re: MultiStrOpt doesn't always accept multiple strings
  From: OpenStack Hudson, 2012-03-14
• [Bug 954488] Re: nova/openstack/common/cfg.py: 'nova.api.openstack.contrib.standard_extensions' is non-existant
  From: OpenStack Hudson, 2012-03-14
• [Bug 951197] Re: openstack namespace does not play nicely with checkedout repos
  From: OpenStack Hudson, 2012-03-14
• [Bug 955308] [NEW] MultiStrOpt doesn't always accept multiple strings
  From: Johannes Erdfelt, 2012-03-14
• [Bug 954488] Re: nova/openstack/common/cfg.py: 'nova.api.openstack.contrib.standard_extensions' is non-existant
  From: OpenStack Hudson, 2012-03-14
• [Bug 954488] Re: nova/openstack/common/cfg.py: 'nova.api.openstack.contrib.standard_extensions' is non-existant
  From: Joe Gordon, 2012-03-14
• Re: Design summit status update
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-03-12
• Re: Design summit status update
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-03-12
• Re: Any topics?
  From: Joshua McKenty, 2012-03-12
• Any topics?
  From: Jonathan Bryce, 2012-03-12
• [Bug 951197] Re: openstack namespace does not play nicely with checkedout repos
  From: OpenStack Hudson, 2012-03-10
• [Bug 951197] [NEW] openstack namespace does not play nicely with checkedout repos
  From: Jason Kölker, 2012-03-09
• [Bug 950335] Re: Allow fetching the default value of an opt without interpolation
  From: Mark McLoughlin, 2012-03-09

 •  Take the tour  •  Read the guide  •  Help for mailing lists  

© 2004-2012 Canonical Ltd.  •  Terms of use  •  Contact Launchpad Support  •  System status