openstack-poc team mailing list archive

[Jonathan Bryce <jbryce@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> I agree that the service architecture doesn't belong here.  I think that it's sufficiently contentious (I had my own, different, concerns) that it doesn't belong in a charter.

What specifically would you pull out into a separate proposal? I'm not against splitting it out, but I'd like to understand which parts exactly you have concerns with so we can work on them separate from the rest.

>>> 3. I remember some push-back on the "C, C++ and Python" statement,
>> but I'm personally fine with "C++ and Python".
> 
> I was the one who objected the first time.  My point is that I don't see any reason to bless C++ than, say, Java.  They are both equally widely available, and both would cause equal amounts of pain and brain-death if you tried to use them for something like Nova.
> 
> Why get into language wars when we're not using anything other than Python anyway?
> 
> We could turn this into something vaguer, like "Implementation languages and libraries must be widely and freely available."

I tend to agree with you. Anyone else have opinions on this?