openstack-poc team mailing list archive

["John Purrier" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Does it make sense to discuss the state/progress on the GitHub migration
project? I think someone needs to set some specific target milestones and
track this (not necessarily the PPB). As ttx points out, earlier is better;
if we miss the end of July milestone for having this complete we will likely
need to wait until Diablo is done.

For tomorrow's meeting... PTL's, can you update us on where each of your
projects stand on this? Termie and mtaylor (added to the email) were going
to come up with a plan for review, is this getting done?

John

-----Original Message-----
From: openstack-poc-bounces+john=openstack.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:openstack-poc-bounces+john=openstack.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of John Purrier
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 1:10 PM
To: 'Jay Pipes'; 'Jonathan Bryce'
Cc: openstack-poc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow

+1 on being totally transparent. Advocates for projects must be at the
meeting where the application is discussed, inevitably questions will come
up that can only be answered by someone with project knowledge.

Jay, what is your concern with PHP?

With all of the project integration work in flight with Keystone, it makes
sense to push on this project. 

John

-----Original Message-----
From: openstack-poc-bounces+john=openstack.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:openstack-poc-bounces+john=openstack.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jay Pipes
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 11:59 AM
To: Jonathan Bryce
Cc: openstack-poc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Jonathan Bryce <jbryce@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As a reminder, we have a Policy Board meeting scheduled for tomorrow in
the
> hour before the weekly team meeting. The Policy Board meeting is 2000
> UTC/3:00 PM CDT.
> We currently have two incubation applications on the agenda. If you get an
> opportunity, please try to review them before the meeting tomorrow. Do you
> think we should try to have Sebastian and Devin present in the meeting to
> answer questions or discuss first without them?

Everything we do should be 100% transparent. I vote we should not only
have them at the meeting, but we should be completely honest and
up-front about the concerns we've had. In particular, it's going to be
tough for Scalr to get past the PHP thing. We have to be honest with
them about that.

> Scalr incubation application - http://wiki.openstack.org/Scalr
> Dashboard incubation application
> -
http://wiki.openstack.org/Projects/IncubatorApplication/OpenStackDashboard
> Let me know if there's anything else you'd like to discuss,

Keystone... what's going on with that from an incubation perspective.
The API proposed seems to have gotten an OK reception, but the API !=
the project. Where do they stand in the incubation process?

-jay

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc
Post to     : openstack-poc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc
Post to     : openstack-poc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp