openstack-poc team mailing list archive
-
openstack-poc team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00205
Re: Revisit project autonomy / project philosophy discussion
2011/7/12 John Dickinson <john.dickinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Jul 12, 2011, at 12:45 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>> So, you'd have bug *reporting* in one place and bug *tracking* in
>> another? And you'd have roadmaps displayed in one place, but roadmap
>> *planning* in another? That sounds like a terrible idea to me.
> This doesn't mean different "places", ie toolsets. Different "roles". Openstack should be focused on doing what is possible to encourage getting these projects into production: large-scale QA, defining the "Openstack vision", and visibility to the community for roadmaps, bugs, and advocacy. The big-picture things rather than toolset-level choices.
I still have no clue what this means. Can you elaborate?
--
Soren Hansen | http://linux2go.dk/
Ubuntu Developer | http://www.ubuntu.com/
OpenStack Developer | http://www.openstack.org/
Follow ups
References