← Back to team overview

openstack-qa-team team mailing list archive

Re: What is going on with test_server_*_ops?

 

Thanks, Jay. But this now confirms that test_server_basic_ops is not running in the gating job. But it does run when I do 'nosetests -v tempest' in my local
environment. How could this be?

 -David

Nothing in the gate log, but this in my local:

test_001_create_keypair (tempest.tests.compute.test_server_basic_ops.TestServerBasicOps) ... ok test_002_create_security_group (tempest.tests.compute.test_server_basic_ops.TestServerBasicOps) ... ok test_003_boot_instance (tempest.tests.compute.test_server_basic_ops.TestServerBasicOps) ... ok test_004_wait_on_active (tempest.tests.compute.test_server_basic_ops.TestServerBasicOps) ... ok test_005_pause_server (tempest.tests.compute.test_server_basic_ops.TestServerBasicOps) ... ok test_006_unpause_server (tempest.tests.compute.test_server_basic_ops.TestServerBasicOps) ... ok test_007_suspend_server (tempest.tests.compute.test_server_basic_ops.TestServerBasicOps) ... ok test_008_resume_server (tempest.tests.compute.test_server_basic_ops.TestServerBasicOps) ... ok test_099_terminate_instance (tempest.tests.compute.test_server_basic_ops.TestServerBasicOps) ... ok



On 9/28/2012 12:12 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
Approved and merged.

On 09/28/2012 11:51 AM, David Kranz wrote:
This was the problem (trivial)  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/13840/.
Some one please review.
I am not sure when the behavior changed.

  -David

On 9/25/2012 10:59 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
That generally pops up when you're bypassing authentication using
--endpoint&  --token (no authentication == no service catalog).

Is it using old command line options to specify auth attributes, which
were just removed in favor of --os-username, --os-password, etc?

https://github.com/openstack/python-keystoneclient/commit/641f6123624b6ac89182c303dfcb0459b28055a2


-Dolph


On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Jay Pipes<jaypipes@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:jaypipes@xxxxxxxxx>>  wrote:

     On 09/25/2012 09:38 AM, David Kranz wrote:
     >  I heard from some of my team members that test_server_basic_ops and
     >  test_server_advanced_ops were failing and I can reproduce it with
     >  current devstack/tempest.
     >  Looking at the code it seems that the keystone Client object
     does not
     >  have a service_catalog object like the error says. So why is
     this not
     >  failing the tempest build?
     >  Looking at the transcript of a recent successful build I don't
     see any
     >  evidence that this test is running but I don't know why that
     would be.
     >
     >    -David
     >
     >
     ======================================================================
     >  ERROR: test suite for<class
     >  'tempest.tests.compute.test_server_basic_ops.TestServerBasicOps'>
     >
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
     >  Traceback (most recent call last):
     >     File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nose/suite.py", line
     208, in run
     >       self.setUp()
     >     File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nose/suite.py", line
     291, in setUp
     >       self.setupContext(ancestor)
     >     File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nose/suite.py", line
     314, in
     >  setupContext
     >       try_run(context, names)
     >     File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nose/util.py", line
     478, in
     >  try_run
     >       return func()
     >     File "/opt/stack/tempest/tempest/test.py", line 39, in setUpClass
     >       cls.manager = cls.manager_class()
     >     File "/opt/stack/tempest/tempest/manager.py", line 96, in
     __init__
     >       self.image_client = self._get_image_client()
     >     File "/opt/stack/tempest/tempest/manager.py", line 138, in
     >  _get_image_client
     >       endpoint =
     keystone.service_catalog.url_for(service_type='image',
     >  AttributeError: 'Client' object has no attribute 'service_catalog'

     I wouldn't be surprised if this is due to a change in
     python-keystoneclient.

     Dolph, was anything changed recently that might have produced this
     failure?

     Thanks,
     -jay









Follow ups

References