openstack-volume team mailing list archive
-
openstack-volume team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00009
Re: nova volume - next steps
I say if this works for Renuka let's plan on it. The next question is how
folks prefer to communicate, I have no preference so I'll leave it up to the
rest of the folks on the list that plan to attend.
John
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Daniel Ford <Daniel.Ford@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Works for me.
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* openstack-volume-bounces+daniel.ford=
> nebula.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [openstack-volume-bounces+daniel.ford=
> nebula.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of John Griffith [
> john.griffith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 12, 2011 11:14 AM
> *To:* Vladimir Popovski
> *Cc:* cthier@xxxxxxxxxxxx; clay.gerrard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Esker, Robert;
> wo@xxxxxxxxxx; Ewan Mellor; openstack-volume@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Holl,
> Jim
> *Subject:* Re: [Openstack-volume] nova volume - next steps
>
> 13:00 PST works for me, others?
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Vladimir Popovski <
> vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I would probably add:
>>
>> - Standardize capability reporting for nova-volume service
>>
>> - Volume-type aware schedulers
>>
>> - Volume-type aware drivers (or actually volume drivers for
>> volume types)?
>>
>>
>>
>> WRT time of the meeting – pls note that there is Vish’s meeting at 2pm
>> PST. We could do ours prior or after that. How about 1pm PST?
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> -Vladimir
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Renuka Apte [mailto:renuka.apte@xxxxxxxxxx]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 12, 2011 10:52 AM
>> *To:* John Griffith; Vladimir Popovski
>> *Cc:* openstack-volume@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Esker, Robert;
>> vishvananda@xxxxxxxxx; cthier@xxxxxxxxxxxx; tim.reddin@xxxxxx;
>> wo@xxxxxxxxxx; Ewan Mellor; Holl, Jim; clay.gerrard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> *Subject:* RE: nova volume - next steps
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi John, everyone,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thursday afternoon works for me. Could we have a specific agenda of
>> everything people would like to bring up, so we can make progress.
>>
>> Should we start/limit the meeting to the topics proposed on etherpad
>> already?
>>
>>
>>
>> So far we have:
>>
>> Add Default Scheduler
>>
>> Zone Aware Volumes
>>
>> API Changes
>>
>> Default volume type flag
>>
>> ADMIN API for dynamic storage
>>
>> Multiple volume creation
>>
>>
>>
>> This already seems like a lot. Anything we need to add? Anything that can
>> wait?
>>
>> Do we have blueprints that need attention?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Renuka.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* John Griffith [mailto:john.griffith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 12, 2011 10:37 AM
>> *To:* Vladimir Popovski
>> *Cc:* Renuka Apte; openstack-volume@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Esker, Robert;
>> vishvananda@xxxxxxxxx; cthier@xxxxxxxxxxxx; tim.reddin@xxxxxx;
>> wo@xxxxxxxxxx; Ewan Mellor; Holl, Jim; clay.gerrard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* Re: nova volume - next steps
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/12/2011 10:56 AM, Vladimir Popovski wrote:
>>
>> Adding volume ML to cc.
>>
>>
>>
>> As John pointed before, it might be beneficial if we will meet over
>> IRC/phone and discuss our requirements for the product. Based on that we
>> could create some work plan and assign priorities.
>>
>> How about this coming Thursday… or is it too early? The alternative option
>> – to do it over email...
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> -Vladimir
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Renuka Apte [mailto:renuka.apte@xxxxxxxxxx]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 12, 2011 9:29 AM
>> *To:* John Griffith
>> *Cc:* Esker, Robert; vishvananda@xxxxxxxxx; Chuck Thier <
>> cthier@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (cthier@xxxxxxxxxxxx); vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> tim.reddin@xxxxxx; wo@xxxxxxxxxx; Ewan Mellor; Holl, Jim;
>> clay.gerrard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* RE: nova volume - next steps
>>
>>
>>
>> Adding Clay from Rackspace.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* John Griffith [mailto:john.griffith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *Sent:* Monday, October 10, 2011 3:46 PM
>> *To:* Renuka Apte
>> *Cc:* Esker, Robert; vishvananda@xxxxxxxxx; Chuck Thier <
>> cthier@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (cthier@xxxxxxxxxxxx); vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> tim.reddin@xxxxxx; wo@xxxxxxxxxx; Ewan Mellor; Holl, Jim
>> *Subject:* Re: nova volume - next steps
>>
>>
>>
>> All,
>> It seems that we all have some thoughts/desires surrounding block storage
>> and ways to integrate with OpenStack. I'm wondering if it would be of
>> value/interest to conduct a meeting (IRC, phone, ???)? I'm open with
>> regards to the format, but I think there are a number of things that folks
>> are interested in here and it might be useful to try and see if we can
>> coordinate a bit to actually contribute something that offers reuse for
>> everybody.
>>
>> It also might be useful for some of us to discuss the current
>> implementation/capabilities and what we feel is missing (if anything).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> John
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Renuka Apte <renuka.apte@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you Vladimir, for creating the group. I have subscribed us to the SM
>> and filedriver blueprints.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Renuka.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Esker, Robert [mailto:Rob.Esker@xxxxxxxxxx]
>> *Sent:* Monday, October 10, 2011 2:48 PM
>> *To:* Renuka Apte; vishvananda@xxxxxxxxx; Chuck Thier <
>> cthier@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (cthier@xxxxxxxxxxxx); vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> tim.reddin@xxxxxx; wo@xxxxxxxxxx; john.griffith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Cc:* Ewan Mellor; Holl, Jim
>> *Subject:* Re: nova volume - next steps
>>
>>
>>
>> Renuka et al,
>>
>>
>>
>> No specific preference on how to communicate… Regarding blueprints:
>>
>>
>>
>> NetApp will be submitting a blueprint for integration with NetApp's
>> OnCommand Provisoning Manager Service Catalog. We've also interest in the
>> following:
>>
>>
>>
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/filedriver
>>
>>
>>
>> Please also add Jim Holl (cc'd here) to this distribution.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>>
>> Rob Esker
>>
>> 408-930-7782
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Renuka Apte <renuka.apte@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> *Date: *Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:20:15 -0700
>> *To: *"vishvananda@xxxxxxxxx" <vishvananda@xxxxxxxxx>, "Chuck Thier <
>> cthier@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (cthier@xxxxxxxxxxxx)" <cthier@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "
>> vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "
>> tim.reddin@xxxxxx" <tim.reddin@xxxxxx>, "wo@xxxxxxxxxx" <wo@xxxxxxxxxx>,
>> Rob Esker <esker@xxxxxxxxxx>, "john.griffith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <
>> john.griffith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> *Cc: *Ewan Mellor <Ewan.Mellor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> *Subject: *nova volume - next steps
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> I thought I should get a thread started with everyone who wants to be
>> involved with the nova volume code.
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. I was wondering how people would like to communicate going
>> forward – mailing list, weekly/biweekly meetings, or emails as required?
>>
>>
>>
>> 2. Could we share any blueprints/ roadmaps that we have, so that
>> everyone knows what’s coming, and to avoid duplicating effort.
>> Currently Citrix is working on getting the storage manager code upstream.
>> Here is the blueprint for that:
>> http://wiki.openstack.org/xenapi-sm-volume-driver
>>
>> I know this one is going to be merged upstream soon:
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/volume-cleanup
>>
>> I couldn’t find any blueprint for the session we had about “Secure control
>> path for Nova-volume attach”.
>> Vish, do you know the status of these blueprints -
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova?searchtext=volume ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Please add anyone from your team I may have missed.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Renuka.
>>
>>
>>
>> I think Thursday sounds good, not sure of time zones but if folks are
>> interested we can try to get something organized today.
>>
>> John
>>
>
>
Follow ups
References