openstack team mailing list archive

[Michael Barton <mike-launchpad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Rick Clark <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think that we should focus on finding regressions at review time not bugs.
>
> I propose that the following criteria be used for approving code reviews:
>  * Architectural soundness
>  * regression free
>  * Code cleanliness (Pep8 compliance) and style
>  * Complete test coverage
>  * Documentation
> Any obvious non-regressing bugs should be filed in Launchpad at review
> time by the reviewer.



I kind of feel like accepting broken code just because it has good
documentation, test coverage or whatever is backwards.

But I don't know much about what's going on with nova development.  It
might make sense to do this to get the change queue flushed.

-- Mike