openstack team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: Glance/Nova Snapshot Changes
Is there a reason you need to even touch Glance from the Nova API
server before returning metadata? Could you just generate and return
what that will be, or do you need to obtain something from Glance
for the return (like image_id)?
For compute API/manager, you can make this a call instead of a cast so
it waits for a return value too. You could have the compute.manager
method return the metadata, but this means possibly blocking until
a worker can pick it up from the queue. In the future we can create
a non-blocking API call (as we will for other methods) that quickly
returns an operation ID that you can query later for metadata. You
probably would still need the two calls if you need some data returned
from Glance to fulfill the API request, since you wouldn't want to
block while the entire image is being saved.
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:38:05PM +0000, Rick Harris wrote:
> In developing Nova's instance snapshots, I've run into a little snag
> revolving around somed design decisions in both Nova and Glance. I have a
> plan that I'd like to move forward with ASAP, so please, if you see any
> problems or have any objections, raise them now.
> OpenStack's API divides calls into a "top-half" which returns quickly
> (compute/api.py) and a fire-and-forget "bottom-half" (compute/manager.py)
> which is long-running.
> The problems is that the image-create OpenStack API call (which maps to
> instance-snapshot) requires the image-metadata (id, name, status, etc) be
> returned up front. The current implementation, however, doesn't create the
> image in Glance until the snapshot is actually being uploaded which
> well after the OpenStack API "top-half" has returned.
> (* Aside: To facilitate caching, Glance treats image data as immutable,
> is one reason we wanted to hold off on creating the Image record in Glance
> until the data was actually present. *)
> Since we cannot change the OpenStack API (yet), we'll need to modify both
> Nova and
> Glance to allow Images to exist *before* their data is available.
> Proposed Solution
> Here is my suggestion:
> * Glance images are given a status of 'queued', 'saving', 'active', or
> 'killed'. This field already exists-- I'm noting the statuses here
> we're going to start using them to enforce state. (Note: CloudServers
> a 'preparing' state which is no longer needed in the Nova-Glance
> * We modify Glance to allow the client to omit the image data on
> image-create (aka POST). When Glance detects this, it creates a
> for the image in the registry, puts it into the 'queued' state, and
> returns the image metadata.
> * We modify Glance to allow data to be uploaded in a subsequent PUT
> While the data is being uploaded, the image will be in the 'saving'
> if the operation completes sucessfully, it will go to 'active',
> it will go to 'killed'. Note, since we have an immutability constraint
> images, we should not allow image data to be updated once it exists,
> once the image goes 'active', subsequent PUT requests should fail with
> 409 Conflict (or something similar). Also note, this is at odds
> with ReSTful semantics since a PUT in this case (when image data is
> present in the request body) is no longer idempotent. If we can think
> a better way, I'm all ears, however, for now I think the tradeoff is
> * We modify OpenStack API image-create "top-half" to call
> ImageService.create which will POST to Glance without the image data.
> will then return the image-metadata (with the image in a 'queued'
> to the callee. The "top-half" will then pass the "image_id" to the
> "bottom-half" which can upload the data into the specified image.
> * Modify Glance XenServer plugin to accept the image_id as an argument
> to PUT to that resource.
> This is the bare-minimum that will need to change for now, down the road,
> we'll need to consider:
> * Creating a monitor task that timeouts images that hang out in the
> and 'saving' state for too long, and a task that deletes images in the
> 'killed' status.
> Also, Glance now has Python bindings in the form of its 'client.py'. As
> of this effort, I'm planning on modifying ImageService::Glance to use the
> Glance client. This will mean that Nova will require that Glance be
> on the same machine running nova-api in order to use the Glance service.
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message (including any attached or
> embedded documents) is intended for the exclusive and confidential use of the
> individual or entity to which this message is addressed, and unless otherwise
> expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged information of Rackspace.
> Any dissemination, distribution or copying of the enclosed material is prohibited.
> If you receive this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail
> at abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, and delete the original message.
> Your cooperation is appreciated.
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp