openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00288
Re: Glance x-image-meta-type raw vs machine
2011/1/14 Diego Parrilla Santamaría <diego.parrilla.santamaria@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Well... VMX is probably too VMware oriented. My only concern about this kind
> of proprietary parameter file is you don't really have the chance to control
> its lifecycle. New versions, changes... and developers lagging behind of
> this changes. It can be a nightmare.
> But this is more a decision of Product Management than a technical
> decision... from my perspective. From a pure user perspective, the more
> options the better, of course.
> BTW, I think we did a good job in Abicloud about virtual disk formats and
> virtual images: http://abiquo.org/display/ABI16/Virtual+Images+Introduction
Helpful link, thanks Diego :)
Followup question, based partly on the table of supported disk
formats: instead of the general VMDK as a disk format, should we have
a more broken-down format for, say, sparse VMDK?
In other words, how fine-grained should the metadata about an image in
Glance be?
-jay
Follow ups
References
-
Glance x-image-meta-type raw vs machine
From: Ewan Mellor, 2011-01-02
-
Re: Glance x-image-meta-type raw vs machine
From: Jay Pipes, 2011-01-10
-
Re: Glance x-image-meta-type raw vs machine
From: John Purrier, 2011-01-10
-
Re: Glance x-image-meta-type raw vs machine
From: Jay Pipes, 2011-01-10
-
Re: Glance x-image-meta-type raw vs machine
From: John Purrier, 2011-01-10
-
Re: Glance x-image-meta-type raw vs machine
From: Ewan Mellor, 2011-01-12
-
Re: Glance x-image-meta-type raw vs machine
From: Jay Pipes, 2011-01-13
-
Re: Glance x-image-meta-type raw vs machine
From: Diego Parrilla Santamaría, 2011-01-13
-
Re: Glance x-image-meta-type raw vs machine
From: Jay Pipes, 2011-01-13
-
Re: Glance x-image-meta-type raw vs machine
From: Diego Parrilla Santamaría, 2011-01-14