openstack team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: new config file for nova-api
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Jay Pipes <jaypipes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If more documentation enables deployers to properly deploy Nova, it's
> in scope. At least, that's my opinion.
In scope for documentation, I meant that flags and paste.deploy don't
configure the same types of things.
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Andy Smith <andyster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > My understanding is that the paste.deploy config is unrelated to the
> > system and is rather separate in scope.
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jay Pipes <jaypipes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Armando Migliaccio
> >> <Armando.Migliaccio@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > I have noticed that recently a new way of configuring nova-api has
> >> > introduced. It seems that the old gflags style has been replaced in
> >> > favour
> >> > of paste.deploy style.
> >> >
> >> > I am trying to find information about this transition, and how old
> >> > config
> >> > files can be translated to new ones. Do we just past the flags under
> >> > [DEFAULT] section? I am also wondering if this is going to be done for
> >> > other
> >> > services other than nova-api.
> >> >
> >> > This blueprint does not seem to have a lot of information.
> >> Hey Todd and Anne,
> >> Think we can add a bit of documentation about this? Armando, can you
> >> file a bug so that we can track the documentation needs?
> >> Thanks!
> >> jay
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> >> Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp