openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00587
Re: Allowing clients to pass capability requests through tags?
+1
Brian Schott
bfschott@xxxxxxxxx
On Feb 11, 2011, at 3:38 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
> I just don't think you can get enough information from zone. Volumes/Instances might
> need to be literally in the same rack. The same could be true for lbs/firewalls. Coarse
> zones might be good for some cases, butI think locality to actual objects is really useful
> in the long run. We don't necessarily need to provide it for all objects, but we should
> for the ones where it makes sense. We can fallback to course zones for objects
> that don't need it.
>
> Vish
References
-
Allowing clients to pass capability requests through tags?
From: Justin Santa Barbara, 2011-02-10
-
Re: Allowing clients to pass capability requests through tags?
From: Justin Santa Barbara, 2011-02-10
-
Re: Allowing clients to pass capability requests through tags?
From: Eric Day, 2011-02-11
-
Re: Allowing clients to pass capability requests through tags?
From: Sandy Walsh, 2011-02-11
-
Re: Allowing clients to pass capability requests through tags?
From: Eric Day, 2011-02-11
-
Re: Allowing clients to pass capability requests through tags?
From: Vishvananda Ishaya, 2011-02-11
-
Re: Allowing clients to pass capability requests through tags?
From: Eric Day, 2011-02-11
-
Re: Allowing clients to pass capability requests through tags?
From: Vishvananda Ishaya, 2011-02-11
-
Re: Allowing clients to pass capability requests through tags?
From: Eric Day, 2011-02-11
-
Re: Allowing clients to pass capability requests through tags?
From: Vishvananda Ishaya, 2011-02-11