openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01666
Re: heterogeneous instance types
That is a good idea if the networking service supports it. One of the things we've been thinking about is how to best to make the virt subsystem more modular. It really needs a better driver-style interface with plugins for non-libvirt virts, I think.
Mikyung actually had to build a bare metal TFTP-boot image management system for the Tilera system because it doesn't currently support KVM or Xen. I could see some HPC folks interested in managing bare-metal XCAT or Perceus machines.
Brian Schott
bfschott@xxxxxxxxx
On Apr 1, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Brian Schott wrote:
>>
>> I've uploaded a family of related of blueprints that the USC-ISI team is hoping to integrate into the Diablo release:
>>
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/heterogeneous-instance-types
>> http://wiki.openstack.org/HeterogeneousInstanceTypes
>
> Hey Brian, interesting work!
>
> I was wondering if you planned support for multiple hypervisor types in
> parallel. With the recent addition of LXC, it makes sense to run an IaaS
> that proposes two types of instances, say KVM and LXC, and routes
> requests to the appropriate subset of compute nodes. Currently we only
> support one type of compute node.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
> Release Manager, OpenStack
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
References