← Back to team overview

openstack team mailing list archive

Re: Federated Identity Management (bursting and zones)


From: Eric Day [eday@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> The extra cost is this introduces a new type. If we are going with an
> authenticated user returning a list of accounts or account/action
> tuples, then having another type for resource groups seems
> excessive. It seems we only need one mapping layer here, not two.

Sorry, I made that confusing. Resource = Object from our previous discussion.

I was using the terminology already adopted by Jorge's group.

Resource Group = list of Objects.

> I'm not sure if we're agreeing with different terminology or if
> there are actually differences. :)  What I interpreted on the wiki
> didn't seem to line up with how we were talking last Friday on IRC,
> but this could be my misunderstanding.

Hopefully we're saying the same thing? :)

I don't think this is a radically different collection than List-of-Users.


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message (including any attached or
embedded documents) is intended for the exclusive and confidential use of the
individual or entity to which this message is addressed, and unless otherwise
expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged information of Rackspace.
Any dissemination, distribution or copying of the enclosed material is prohibited.
If you receive this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail
at abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, and delete the original message.
Your cooperation is appreciated.

Follow ups