openstack team mailing list archive

["Rouault, Jason (Cloud Services)" <jason.rouault@xxxxxx>]

A user can specify a tenantID at the time of authentication.  If no tenantID
is specified during authentication, then I would expect the 'default' tenant
for the user would apply.  The capabilities of User1 on TenantA (in this
case the default tenant for the user) would be determined by their role and
group assignments within the context of TenantA.  

 

Jason

 

From: Ziad Sawalha [mailto:ziad.sawalha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 10:35 PM
To: Rouault, Jason (Cloud Services); Yuriy Taraday;
openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Keystone tenants vs. Nova projects

 

What if:

 

-          User1 has TenantA as her default tenant

 

Should the service authenticate the user against TenantA? And if so, why?
What does the 'default tenant' grant User1 on TenantA? It's some nebulous,
implied role.

 

 

 

From: "Rouault, Jason (Cloud Services)" <jason.rouault@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:18:44 +0000
To: Ziad Sawalha <ziad.sawalha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yuriy Taraday
<yorik.sar@xxxxxxxxx>, "openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Openstack] Keystone tenants vs. Nova projects

 

If a user is bound to their default tenant, why wouldn't any role
assignments for that user in their default tenant apply?

 

 

User1 authenticates specifying TenantB, this binds User1 into the context of
TenantB.  In subsequent web service requests using the token received after
authentication, the Auth component filter would decorate the headers with
RoleY.

If User1 authenticates specifying TenantA, or specifying no Tenant,  this
binds User1 into the context of TenantA.  The headers would then be
decorated with RoleX.

 

Jason

 

From: openstack-bounces+jason.rouault=hp.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:openstack-bounces+jason.rouault=hp.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Ziad Sawalha
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 10:09 PM
To: Yuriy Taraday; openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Keystone tenants vs. Nova projects

 

Our goal is to support Nova use cases right now. You can provide access to
multiple tenants using a role assignment (assigning a user a role on a
specific tenant effectively binds them to that tenant).

 

However, this raises the issue of what the 'implied' role of a user is when
they are bound to their default tenant. So we're considering how to alter
the model to clean that up. No great solution yet. Any suggestions are
welcome..

 

Ziad

 

From: Yuriy Taraday <yorik.sar@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:59:08 +0400
To: <openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Openstack] Keystone tenants vs. Nova projects

 

Currently Keystone model assumes that user is bound to exactly one tenant.
It conflicts with the fact that in Nova user can have access to several
projects. 

Which way will it be?


Kind regards, Yuriy.

_______________________________________________ Mailing list:
https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help :
https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp This email may include confidential
information. If you received it in error, please delete it.

This email may include confidential information. If you received it in
error, please delete it.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature