openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03726
Re: Issues with Packaging and a Proposal
-
To:
openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
"Peter J. Pouliot" <peter@xxxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:06:09 -0400
-
In-reply-to:
<CADu4cP0R5sf+cxsC5Vh_a=O7TmRdvSXEhP4UJ_0E-XkWiNG3dw@mail.gmail.com>
-
User-agent:
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
hi all,
I'd like to offer up something here. We are in the process of spinning up a local instance of suse's open build system.
I had brought up in the past about using the current public service as an option. I know now that the public obs isn't really an option due to changes we are currently making to add additonal distros not getting into the public service fast enough.
However, I would like to throw it out there for discussion. If I were to provide our instance as an option for building packages for all distro's as a way to coordinate all the package builds w/o recreating the wheel.... Does the rest of the community see this as a viable option which they would consider using? This is some serious hardware that I am dedicated to the cause. We will be using it for cross distro builds of the LIS components for hyperv, so we are already doing the work to add/cleanup ubuntu and centos builds to what already exists in the OBS today.
p
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 05:09:34PM -0500, Michael Barton wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Soren Hansen <soren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Rackspace isn't doing their own packaging because of (lack of) Debian
> > support. If they did, they'd have realised almost immediately that the
> > packages actually build on Debian. They're doing it because there'll
> > supposedly be differences in the behaviour Ubuntu (or any other distro
> > for that matter) will want and what Rackspace will want from the
> > packages. I've becried this divergence countless times, but to no
> > avail.
> >
> > That cloudbuilders aren't using the packages either.. I don't really
> > know what to say about that.
>
> Nobody's maintaining their own packaging because it's lots of fun, but
> we can't close shop every time someone decides to go and nerf the
> openstack packaging. Like right now, the openstack Swift packages are
> broken for the OS cloudfiles deploys on and they're missing useful
> features cloudfiles uses.
>
> -- Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
References