openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04066
Re: [Swift] [Keystone] Account migration
If there is an existing swift customer with swift account 'foo' and nova
project 'bar', there is no way to have them belong to the same Keystone
tenant. I think that is the data migration issue.
Jason
-----Original Message-----
From: openstack-bounces+jason.rouault=hp.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:openstack-bounces+jason.rouault=hp.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Nguyen, Liem Manh
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 2:49 PM
To: John Dickinson
Cc: openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Swift] [Keystone] Account migration
Thanks, John, for pointing out the uuid thing :).
So, let's say I have stored data into a Swift account with a UUID. When I
switch to using Keystone, I would like to continue using my "old" account,
since I have a bunch of data in it. However, the account format has changed
(under Keystone). So, if I have lazy provisioning on (account_autocreate),
would I *accidentally* have 2 Swift accounts instead of one? Ideally, if I
can "migrate" all the old account Ids to use the new format, that would
guarantee consistency between the old accounts and any newly-created
accounts. Am I missing something here?
Liem
-----Original Message-----
From: John Dickinson [mailto:me@xxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 1:11 PM
To: Nguyen, Liem Manh
Cc: openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Swift] [Keystone] Account migration
Swift treats the <hash> or <tenantid> part of the account as an opaque
string. (Technically, the first one isn't a hash but a uuid.) I don't think
there is any migration path because there is nothing to migrate.
But I may be missing something.
--John
On Sep 13, 2011, at 2:55 PM, Nguyen, Liem Manh wrote:
> Hello Stackers,
>
> With swauth, Swift accounts are identified by <reseller_prefix>_<hash>.
Under Keystone (with swift_auth and Swift's lazy provisioning), I see the
Swift account now has the format <reseller_prefix>_<tenantId>. So, if we
have existing Swift account data with the old format, how would one go about
migrating from the old format to the Keystone format? Is there a plan to do
so within the Diablo time-frame?
>
> Thanks,
> Liem
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
References