openstack team mailing list archive

[Bryan Taylor <btaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I don't know, but there are several obvious next steps:
 - Document publicly the criteria for a project to fit
 - Identify resources available to participating projects
 - Formalize it with the PPB and unleash it
 - Build the Satellite community

A big question we didn't discuss is what the governance model for 
Satellite should be. I don't necessarily think that a contributor to 
Satellite should be treated the same as a core contributor (eg: vote on 
the PTLs etc). But there may be building blocks within Satellite that 
need to be governed on their own.

I think some of the standards around APIs that cut across services are 
things that Satellite contributors should have a say in. I definitely 
think things like QA and CI matter a lot (perhaps more) to Satellite.


On 10/14/2011 11:24 AM, David Medberry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've not seen anything following the ODS about OpenStack Satellite (or
> whatever new name has been proposed).
>
> Is discussion going on another list?
>
> I also don't see an etherpad for it posted here:
>
> http://wiki.openstack.org/EssexSummitEtherpads
>
> Was the discussion captured somewhere else?
>
> -dave
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

This email may include confidential information. If you received it in error, please delete it.