openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04995
Re: Keystone versioning and tarballs
We definitely need to publish a tarball for diablo.
I recently refactored/centralized our versioning (we were reporting different versions in different places in the codebase). At the same time, I also set the `keystone.version()` response to 'essex-dev', since we haven't discussed codebase versioning very thoroughly, and it needed to be updated to *something* post-diablo. So, this is certainly open to feedback/suggestions/discussion!
-Dolph
________________________________________
From: Mark McLoughlin [markmc@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 2:03 AM
To: Ziad Sawalha; Dolph Mathews; Thierry Carrez
Cc: openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Keystone versioning and tarballs
Hey,
I just noticed a few things when reviewing the Fedora packaging of
keystone:
- There's no diablo release tarball on https://launchpad.net/keystone
like other projects
- The 2011.3 tag in git has version=1.0 in setup.py. Which versioning
scheme is keystone going to follow?
- The version in master is non-numeric 'essex' rather than e.g.
2011.3 or 1.1
Thanks,
Mark.
This email may include confidential information. If you received it in error, please delete it.
Follow ups
References