openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #05528
Re: Glance API semantics when image sizes aren't known
> From: Vishvananda Ishaya [mailto:vishvananda@xxxxxxxxx]
> > On Nov 15, 2011, at 2:17 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
> >
> > With the bug in the Swift backend fixed, I think it will work just fine
> > to stream through a glance client in this way.
>
> Only if the image is < 5 GB. Otherwise swift will blow up trying to store it.
We should use manifest-style upload in the case where the image_size is unknown. That way, we'd be able to upload the object no matter which size it turned out to be.
There's no downside to that, is there?
Ewan.
References
-
Glance API semantics when image sizes aren't known
From: Ewan Mellor, 2011-11-15
-
Re: Glance API semantics when image sizes aren't known
From: Jay Pipes, 2011-11-15
-
Re: Glance API semantics when image sizes aren't known
From: Ewan Mellor, 2011-11-15
-
Re: Glance API semantics when image sizes aren't known
From: Jay Pipes, 2011-11-15
-
Re: Glance API semantics when image sizes aren't known
From: Ewan Mellor, 2011-11-15
-
Re: Glance API semantics when image sizes aren't known
From: Jay Pipes, 2011-11-15
-
Re: Glance API semantics when image sizes aren't known
From: Ewan Mellor, 2011-11-15
-
Re: Glance API semantics when image sizes aren't known
From: Jay Pipes, 2011-11-15
-
Re: Glance API semantics when image sizes aren't known
From: Ewan Mellor, 2011-11-15
-
Re: Glance API semantics when image sizes aren't known
From: Vishvananda Ishaya, 2011-11-15