openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #05620
Re: [nova-testing] Efforts for Essex
2011/11/22 Soren Hansen <soren@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> (real) Unit tests are our documentation and having to jump around to find out how the plumbing works doesn't make for good documentation.
> I agree. That's exactly why I *don't* want mocks (for this) in the unit tests.
It's been pointed out to me that I'm not making sense here. Thanks, Devin. :)
The point is that I don't want to deal with the plumbing *at all*. I
just want to be able to stick stuff in the data store and then let my
production (as in non-test) code be able to pull it out again without
mucking about with mocks (har har).
--
Soren Hansen | http://linux2go.dk/
Ubuntu Developer | http://www.ubuntu.com/
OpenStack Developer | http://www.openstack.org/
References
-
[nova-testing] Efforts for Essex
From: Soren Hansen, 2011-11-21
-
Re: [nova-testing] Efforts for Essex
From: Kevin L. Mitchell, 2011-11-21
-
Re: [nova-testing] Efforts for Essex
From: Rohit Karajgi, 2011-11-22
-
Re: [nova-testing] Efforts for Essex
From: Soren Hansen, 2011-11-22
-
Re: [nova-testing] Efforts for Essex
From: Jay Pipes, 2011-11-22
-
Re: [nova-testing] Efforts for Essex
From: Kevin L. Mitchell, 2011-11-22
-
Re: [nova-testing] Efforts for Essex
From: Jay Pipes, 2011-11-22
-
Re: [nova-testing] Efforts for Essex
From: Soren Hansen, 2011-11-22
-
Re: [nova-testing] Efforts for Essex
From: Sandy Walsh, 2011-11-22
-
Re: [nova-testing] Efforts for Essex
From: Soren Hansen, 2011-11-22