openstack team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

Re: [GLANCE] Proposal: Combine the "container_format" and "disk_format" fields in 2.0 Images API

To: 'Soren Hansen' <soren@xxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Donal Lafferty <donal.lafferty@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 12:02:01 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: "openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAPFUtkZv9pm_oPUgJ=qgdpzTE9=Kcqb3g8PRMdfWhO8D=_PZFA@mail.gmail.com>
Thread-index: Acyw4+KiyOP2IphxS7eI/HZ54R1NkAABV37g
Thread-topic: [Openstack] [GLANCE] Proposal: Combine the "container_format" and "disk_format" fields in 2.0 Images API

> I simply don't think adding a vendor part to the container type string is going to
> be a very good way to encode this.
> 

Can this even be done with a MIME-style categorization? 


> --
> Soren Hansen        | http://linux2go.dk/ Ubuntu Developer    |
> http://www.ubuntu.com/ OpenStack Developer | http://www.openstack.org/

Follow ups

Re: [GLANCE] Proposal: Combine the "container_format" and "disk_format" fields in 2.0 Images API
From: Soren Hansen, 2011-12-05

References

[GLANCE] Proposal: Combine the "container_format" and "disk_format" fields in 2.0 Images API
From: Jay Pipes, 2011-12-01
Re: [GLANCE] Proposal: Combine the "container_format" and "disk_format" fields in 2.0 Images API
From: Donal Lafferty, 2011-12-02
Re: [GLANCE] Proposal: Combine the "container_format" and "disk_format" fields in 2.0 Images API
From: Soren Hansen, 2011-12-02
Re: [GLANCE] Proposal: Combine the "container_format" and "disk_format" fields in 2.0 Images API
From: Donal Lafferty, 2011-12-02
Re: [GLANCE] Proposal: Combine the "container_format" and "disk_format" fields in 2.0 Images API
From: Soren Hansen, 2011-12-02