openstack team mailing list archive

[Sandy Walsh <sandy.walsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Exactly! ... or it could be handled in the notifier itself.

________________________________________
From: openstack-bounces+sandy.walsh=rackspace.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [openstack-bounces+sandy.walsh=rackspace.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Mark Washenberger [mark.washenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 12:36 PM
To: openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Orchestration] Handling error events ... explicit     vs. implicit

Gotcha.

So the way this might work is, for example, when a run_instance fails on compute node, it would publish a "run_instance for uuid=<blah> failed" event. There would be a subscriber associated with the scheduler listening for such events--when it receives one it would go check the capacity table and update it to reflect the failure. Does that sound about right?