openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #07085
Re: nova/puppet blueprint, and some questions
On 1/27/12 4:49 AM, Belmiro Moreira wrote:
The idea of integrating nova with "configuration management tools"
(puppet, chef, ...) is very interesting. But in my opinion we
shouldn't have a specific implementation to a single tool or a small
set of tools.
Yep, I'm increasingly convinced of this. I'm planning to rewrite the
proposal as an abstract package configuration tool with a driver model
(so that the choice of puppet/chef/whatever can be handled depending on
the driver.)
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/configuration-drive
Right on! That feature is exactly what I need. Is it available via KVM?
What you have in your screenshot is really interesting but it seems
very similar to other tools already implemented to manage puppet
modules, ex: "Foreman".
Sure. But, again, I think having this information available to (and
configurable by) nova will be much more useful than grafting a separate
tool onto the side of openstack.
-Andrew
References
-
nova/puppet blueprint, and some questions
From: Andrew Bogott, 2012-01-26
-
Re: nova/puppet blueprint, and some questions
From: Tim Bell, 2012-01-26
-
Re: nova/puppet blueprint, and some questions
From: Andrew Bogott, 2012-01-26
-
Re: nova/puppet blueprint, and some questions
From: Andrew Clay Shafer, 2012-01-27
-
Re: nova/puppet blueprint, and some questions
From: Andrew Bogott, 2012-01-27
-
Re: nova/puppet blueprint, and some questions
From: Belmiro Moreira, 2012-01-27