openstack team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

Re: Image API v2 Draft 4

To: Justin Santa Barbara <justin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Jorge Williams <jorge.williams@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:42:08 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: "<openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> " <openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAFoXKmq_6CWMdmE868Ydn=9Pmzq0YcYh_0H9hBk7jLDFULESZA@mail.gmail.com>
Thread-index: AQHNFgqDmq1wk3UH9EWfacfFMHoeVZaTCz0AgAAEIYCAABI0AIAAJKCAgAANHgCAAOQ1gIAAQfOAgAAmmICAAASWAIAACcGAgAAMmIA=
Thread-topic: [Openstack] Image API v2 Draft 4

I'm also a strong supporter of XML. XML does a good job of lowering barriers for a key group of clients, specifically those that work with statically typed languages.  It offers key benefits in terms of extensibility and validation.  I'd hate to lose it.

-jOrGe W.

On Apr 10, 2012, at 12:57 PM, Justin Santa Barbara wrote:

It definitely has improved - thank you for all your work;  I didn't mean to put down anyone's work here.  It's simply a Sisyphean task.

Either way, though, if I had the choice, I'd rip all of nova's XML support out tomorrow…

As a strong supporter of XML, who thinks JSON is for kids that haven't figured out that the Easter bunny isn't real yet :-)...  +1

Justin

Follow ups

Re: Image API v2 Draft 4
From: Justin Santa Barbara, 2012-04-10

References

Image API v2 Draft 4
From: Brian Waldon, 2012-04-09
Re: Image API v2 Draft 4
From: Justin Santa Barbara, 2012-04-09
Re: Image API v2 Draft 4
From: Jay Pipes, 2012-04-09
Re: Image API v2 Draft 4
From: Justin Santa Barbara, 2012-04-09
Re: Image API v2 Draft 4
From: Jay Pipes, 2012-04-09
Re: Image API v2 Draft 4
From: Justin Santa Barbara, 2012-04-09
Re: Image API v2 Draft 4
From: Doug Hellmann, 2012-04-10
Re: Image API v2 Draft 4
From: Jay Pipes, 2012-04-10
Re: Image API v2 Draft 4
From: Justin Santa Barbara, 2012-04-10
Re: Image API v2 Draft 4
From: Kevin L. Mitchell, 2012-04-10
Re: Image API v2 Draft 4
From: Justin Santa Barbara, 2012-04-10