← Back to team overview

openstack team mailing list archive

Re: Monitoring / Billing Architecture proposed

 

Some of the links are broken in the wiki because the github projects got renamed recently to better mesh with OpenStack projects.
The code is here:
https://github.com/griddynamics/nova-billing

You would also need all of their forks of nova, swift, etc. 

If the GD guys are tracking this list, what is the status with respect to merging with trunk?   The project looks interesting and much further along that I though.

Brian

-------------------------------------------------
Brian Schott, CTO
Nimbis Services, Inc.
brian.schott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
ph: 443-274-6064  fx: 443-274-6060



On Apr 22, 2012, at 5:16 PM, Atul Jha wrote:

> Hi,
> Has anyone checked this http://www.griddynamics.com/openstack/docs/nova-billing/quickstart.html
> ________________________________________
> From: openstack-bounces+atul.jha=csscorp.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [openstack-bounces+atul.jha=csscorp.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Endre Karlson [endre.karlson@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 2:27 AM
> To: openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] Monitoring / Billing Architecture proposed
> 
> What is Dough then compared to what you want to do ?
> 
> 2012/4/22 Endre Karlson <endre.karlson@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:endre.karlson@xxxxxxxxx>>
> What is Dough then ?
> 
> 
> 2012/4/22 Brian Schott <brian.schott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:brian.schott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> I see this blueprint for metering, but none for Dough currently.
> http://wiki.openstack.org/EfficientMetering
> 
> Here are the Dough slides, however:
> http://www.slideshare.net/lzyeval/dough-openstack-billing-project
> 
> We collectively need to talk more about the user scenarios, because I don't think you can just put a decorator around the API rpc calls and get an accurate picture of what to bill for later.  There are metered things like bandwidth or IOPS, events that happen outside of the API (shutdown -h), and it is hard to predict what a reseller will want to charge for.  It is better to put a metering system in that can handle many billing configurations.
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------
> Brian Schott, CTO
> Nimbis Services, Inc.
> brian.schott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:brian.schott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ph: 443-274-6064<tel:443-274-6064>  fx: 443-274-6060<tel:443-274-6060>
> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 22, 2012, at 3:36 PM, Luis Gervaso wrote:
> 
> Dough is the proposed billing platform/product (where the billing rules live), isn't it?
> 
> I don't know Dough enough, so please me correct me if i'm wrong.
> 
> I'm trying to define a generic/agnostic integration process, obviously where Dough
> can fit perfectly. I would like it become part to the reference architecture.
> 
> Option 1) [3b in the arch proposed]
> 
> Dough should pull NoSQL
> 
> Option 2)
> 
> A Mediator can feed Dough
> 
> 
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Endre Karlson <endre.karlson@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:endre.karlson@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> What about using the Dough project?
> 
> Endre.
> 
> 
> 2012/4/22 Endre Karlson <endre.karlson@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:endre.karlson@xxxxxxxxx>>
> What about using the Dough project ?
> 
> Endre.
> 
> 2012/4/22 Luis Gervaso <luis@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:luis@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Hi,
> 
> I want to share the architecture i am developing in order to perform the monitorig / billing OpenStack support:
> 
> 1. AMQP Client which listen to RabbitMQ / QPid (this should be interchangeable) (Own Stuff or ServiceMix / Camel)
> 
> 2. Events should be stored on a NoSQL document oriented database (I think mongodb is perfect, since we can query in a super easy fashion)
> 
> 3a. The monitoring system can pull/push MongoDB
> 
> 3b. The billing system can pull to create invoices
> 
> 4. A mediation EIP should be necessary to integrate a billing/monitoring product. (ServiceMix / Camel)
> 
> This is to receive your feedback. So please, critics are welcome!
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> --
> -------------------------------------------
> Luis Alberto Gervaso Martin
> Woorea Solutions, S.L
> CEO & CTO
> mobile: (+34) 627983344<tel:%28%2B34%29%20627983344>
> luis@<mailto:luis.gervaso@xxxxxxxxx>woorea.es<http://woorea.es/>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> -------------------------------------------
> Luis Alberto Gervaso Martin
> Woorea Solutions, S.L
> CEO & CTO
> mobile: (+34) 627983344<tel:%28%2B34%29%20627983344>
> luis@<mailto:luis.gervaso@xxxxxxxxx>woorea.es<http://woorea.es/>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> 
> 
> http://www.csscorp.com/common/email-disclaimer.php
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


References