← Back to team overview

openstack team mailing list archive

Re: [Metering] schema and counter definitions

 

I agree.  Do you have any plans how to coordinate our efforts ?


On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Doug Hellmann
<doug.hellmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Tomasz Paszkowski <ss7pro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Doug Hellmann
>> <doug.hellmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > Nice!
>> >
>> > For production code I think we are going to want to separate collection
>> > from
>> > storage, aren't we? We don't want each compute node to require access to
>> > the
>> > database server (that's an issue with nova that they are trying to fix
>> > during the folsom release, IIRC).
>>
>> Yes. Part of the code responsible for amqp support is not functional yet
>> :(
>
>
> OK, that's what I thought.
>
> We all seem to be reinventing different parts of the services that we will
> eventually need, which is good for education but may be wasting a bit of
> energy. Is it premature to start talking a little more about architecture so
> we can start splitting up the implementation work and focusing that energy
> differently? There is a lot of work we can do independently of the remaining
> decisions outlined in http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/MeteringAgenda.
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tomasz Paszkowski
>> SS7, Asterisk, SAN, Datacenter, Cloud Computing
>> +48500166299
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>



-- 
Tomasz Paszkowski
SS7, Asterisk, SAN, Datacenter, Cloud Computing
+48500166299


References