openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #11513
Re: [Metering] schema and counter definitions
-
To:
openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Thu, 10 May 2012 10:05:03 +0200
-
In-reply-to:
<CADb+p3RtZasYUjEGe6HJDpx2BxO8yN9DWBq+9Y_=Ja=+NiX-7A@mail.gmail.com>
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120329 Icedove/10.0.3
On 05/09/2012 11:11 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Tomasz Paszkowski <ss7pro@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:ss7pro@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Doug Hellmann
> <doug.hellmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:doug.hellmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> > Nice!
> >
> > For production code I think we are going to want to separate collection from
> > storage, aren't we? We don't want each compute node to require access to the
> > database server (that's an issue with nova that they are trying to fix
> > during the folsom release, IIRC).
>
> Yes. Part of the code responsible for amqp support is not functional yet :(
>
>
> OK, that's what I thought.
>
> We all seem to be reinventing different parts of the services that we will eventually need, which is good for education but may be wasting a bit of energy. Is it premature to start talking a little more about architecture so we can start splitting up the implementation work and focusing that energy differently? There is a lot of work we can do independently of the remaining decisions outlined in http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/MeteringAgenda.
Hi,
It looks like the architecture of metering is indeed always implemented in similar ways. I had discussions with a company yesterday about their own metering implementation (which will be used in production soon) and it also has an architecture matching what has been proposed so far in ceilometer. I added a few points to the architecture chapter in the wiki:
http://wiki.openstack.org/EfficientMetering#Architecture
including a note summarizing the conclusions of the discussion regarding need for an independent ceilometer agent in addition to the existing meters provided by the OpenStack components.
What do you think ?
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Tomasz Paszkowski
> SS7, Asterisk, SAN, Datacenter, Cloud Computing
> +48500166299 <tel:%2B48500166299>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
> Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
--
Loïc Dachary Chief Research Officer
// eNovance labs http://labs.enovance.com
// ? loic@xxxxxxxxxxxx ? +33 1 49 70 99 82
References