openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #12110
Re: [metering] high-level design proposal
On 05/22/2012 03:26 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> -> In addition to a signature, I think we would need a sequence number
> to be embedded by the agent for each message sent, so that loss of
> messages, or forgery of messages, can be detected by the collector and
> further audit process.
>
>
> OK. We have a message id, but I assumed those would be used to eliminate
> duplicates so this sounds like something different or new. It implies
> that the agent knows its own id (not hard) and keeps up with a sequence
> counter (more difficult, though not impossible). Did you have something
> in mind for how to implement that?
Actually, this was my intent in the original blueprint when I specified
the "message_id" field then a couple lines bellow: "a process may verify
that messages were not lost". On the implementation side, I was
thinking that each agent would maintain its own sequence count, as a
global instance count would be pricier. In my mind, non repudiation was
built from the message_signature + message_id which should be unique for
each agent.
Nick
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Follow ups
References