openstack team mailing list archive

[Gabriel Hurley <Gabriel.Hurley@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> That sounds good to me, but it only addresses the short term issue.  If the
> plan is to use Node.js for more in the future, we're going to have the same
> conversation when that next patch comes up.

Heh. That was my point to Thierry about 8 messages ago. ;-)

I totally agree it's only a short-term solution to work with the distros to stopgap the CSS files. But I think it does give us this option:

Speaking just for myself and *my* view of the Horizon Folsom roadmap (Devin obviously gets more say in this than I do), I think keeping node.js as an optional (but recommended) dependency for Folsom is doable. That way the Horizon contributors can then keep developing the features they want to contribute and believe are important as long as they don't preclude core functionality without node.js, and it would give downstream distros almost a year (to the close of the G cycle) to get node.js into their package systems for production code.

Just my two cents on this one... my team may kick my a** for it. ;-)

   - Gabriel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: openstack-bounces+gabriel.hurley=nebula.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:openstack-
> bounces+gabriel.hurley=nebula.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Russell Bryant
> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 1:20 PM
> To: openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] Nodejs in horizon
> 
> On 05/25/2012 03:35 PM, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
> > I have no problem with distros generating CSS files however they like;
> > overriding what stylesheet is included is trivial and already quite
> > possible. If that's a viable solution for distros who don't currently
> > support node.js I'm all for it. Documenting what those distros would
> > need to do would be a compromise I'm more than happy with... ;-)
> 
> That sounds good to me, but it only addresses the short term issue.  If the
> plan is to use Node.js for more in the future, we're going to have the same
> conversation when that next patch comes up.
> 
> What kind of timeline do you think that would be?  Would it be after Folsom?
> Maybe by then the state of Node.js packages will be in better shape.
> 
> --
> Russell Bryant
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp