openstack team mailing list archive

[Dan Wendlandt <dan@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Ian Wells <ijw.ubuntu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 7 June 2012 19:08, Dan Wendlandt <dan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Where was the reference to "quantum create_net xxx"?  was it in the list
> of
> > all commands supported by the Quantum client?
> > (
> http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-network/admin/content/Validation-d1e447.html
> ).
> >   Perhaps we should remove this list to avoid confusion, or put a
> specific
> > comment in the Nova section that "quantum create_net" should not be used.
>
> Yes, that was it.  It's the first thing you run, so it stuck in mind;
> it looks like perfectly reasonable command to be running; and it comes
> back with precisely the UUID you expect to see, with the sole
> difference that that ID doesn't actually work. ;)  Also, as it
> happens, I didn't want network addresses allocating, so I assumed
> doing the Quantum create would be more appropriate - I hadn't realised
> that both Quantum and Nova need a net record.
>

Yeah, makes sense.  I'll add some cautionary notes to the docs in both
places.

Thankfully for Folsom we won't have to deal with this, as networks +
subnets can be created directly via quantum.

dan


>
> --
> Ian.
>



-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dan Wendlandt
Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com
twitter: danwendlandt
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~