| Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
Hi,
I'm working on the Openstack driver for Deltacloud
(http://deltacloud.apache.org/) and I've come across an Openstack
compute API issue that I hope someone may be able to help with.
I'm having some trouble determining the 'public' IP address of a created
server using the API. It seems that all addresses are labelled as
'private'... e.g.:
#<Net::HTTPOK 200 OK readbody=true>
(rdb:1) response.body
"{\"server\": {\"status\": \"ACTIVE\", \"updated\":
\"2012-05-28T10:20:17Z\",
8<---SNIP--->8
{\"private\": [{\"version\": 4, \"addr\": \"10.6.228.27\"},
{\"version\": 4, \"addr\": \"15.185.163.73\"}]},
8<---SNIP--->8
Even after allocating and attaching a floating 'ip':
#<Net::HTTPOK 200 OK readbody=true>
(rdb:1) response.body
"{\"server\": {\"status\": \"ACTIVE\", \"updated\": \"2012-05-28T10:20:17Z\"
8<---SNIP--->8
\"private\": [{\"version\": 4, \"addr\": \"10.6.228.27\"}, {\"version\":
4, \"addr\": \"15.185.163.73\"}, {\"version\": 4, \"addr\":
\"15.185.168.139\"}]}
8<---SNIP--->8
The above requests/responses are talking to the Openstack installation @
hpcloud ('diablo' i believe). However, seeing a related question on
launchpad.net:
"https://answers.launchpad.net/nova/+question/185110"; it appears this
isn't an HP-cloud specific issue.
Given that there is no way for me currently to create/manage networks
via the API in order to correctly assign the 'public' IP(s) to a network
labelled 'public' (e.g. HP doesn't expose the quantum API - though
looking at quantum I can't see how to place IP addresses in a specific
network anyway), how can I differentiate between the public and private
IPs of my Servers? One way I could do this is pattern matching on
10.0.0.0/8 192.168.0.0/16, 172.16.0.0/12 - but this seems 'messy'.
Is it safe to assume that the returned addresses are always in the order
"private first and then public"? The ruby bindings 'ruby-openstack'
(https://github.com/ruby-openstack/ruby-openstack) and the hp-cloud
specific 'hp fog'
(https://docs.hpcloud.com/sites/default/files/downloads/hpfog_2.tar)
both do this: they 'grab' the first returned address as 'private' and
everything else is 'public'.
I don't think this is a very safe way of determining the addresses; I
plan to change the behaviour of the ruby-openstack gem to use 'pattern
matching' on the private/reserved address space as imo that is the
lesser of the two evils (vs just grabbing the first address). Thanks for
your time and thoughts,
marios
| Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
