openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #13261
Re: glance_api_servers vs. glance_host vs. keystone?
Hi Lars -
Sounds like you're really looking for a conceptual understanding and I
like that! Keystone does maintain the service catalog, and the Image
service (glance) needs specific entries. See
http://docs.openstack.org/essex/openstack-compute/install/yum/content/keystone-concepts.html.
I believe glance_host and glance_port are deprecated and not needed in
an Essex installation, use only glance_api_servers in the nova.conf.
Gabe has good answers for your previous questions - and hopefully you
can reference this page for Qpid configuration information:
http://docs.openstack.org/essex/openstack-compute/admin/content/configuration-qpid.html
Anne
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman
<lars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Well, apologies for the stupid subject line. In the interests of
> sewing as much confusion as possible, here's the question that was
> supposed to go along with that subject:
>
> nova.conf appears to sport several configuration options related to
> glance, including:
>
> - glance_host
> - glance_port
> - glance_api_servers
>
> These seem suspiciously similar. Do they do the same thing? And
> shouldn't this information actually come from Keystone, in which there
> is an endpoint registered for the glance service?
>
> --
> Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
> Senior Technologist | http://ac.seas.harvard.edu/
> Academic Computing | http://code.seas.harvard.edu/
> Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences |
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
References