← Back to team overview

openstack team mailing list archive

Re: glance_api_servers vs. glance_host vs. keystone?

 

Hi Lars -

Sounds like you're really looking for a conceptual understanding and I
like that! Keystone does maintain the service catalog, and the Image
service (glance) needs specific entries. See
http://docs.openstack.org/essex/openstack-compute/install/yum/content/keystone-concepts.html.

I believe glance_host and glance_port are deprecated and not needed in
an Essex installation, use only glance_api_servers in the nova.conf.

Gabe has good answers for your previous questions - and hopefully you
can reference this page for Qpid configuration information:
http://docs.openstack.org/essex/openstack-compute/admin/content/configuration-qpid.html

Anne

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman
<lars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Well, apologies for the stupid subject line.  In the interests of
> sewing as much confusion as possible, here's the question that was
> supposed to go along with that subject:
>
> nova.conf appears to sport several configuration options related to
> glance, including:
>
> - glance_host
> - glance_port
> - glance_api_servers
>
> These seem suspiciously similar.  Do they do the same thing?  And
> shouldn't this information actually come from Keystone, in which there
> is an endpoint registered for the glance service?
>
> --
> Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>       |
> Senior Technologist                                | http://ac.seas.harvard.edu/
> Academic Computing                                 | http://code.seas.harvard.edu/
> Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences |
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


References