openstack team mailing list archive

["Vaze, Mandar" <Mandar.Vaze@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

"public_port" is configurable via keystone.conf - so if port 5000 is blocked in specific setup, it is trivial to change it to some other port.

why make so many changes (REST docs, XML docs, devstack, and the code) for a parameter that can be easily tweaked ?

-Mandar

-----Original Message-----
From: openstack-bounces+mandar.vaze=nttdata.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:openstack-bounces+mandar.vaze=nttdata.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joseph Heck
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 4:46 AM
To: openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Subject: [Openstack] [keystone] Keystone on port 5000 - proposing change default port to 8770

At the risk of a terrible public tar and feathering...

I've learned that port 5000 (which Keystone is using for it's default public-token-auth stuff) is commonly blocked by many firewalls, as it's been registered as a Microsoft uPnP port. 

I thought I'd go ahead and propose changing the default to 8770. I picked this number because it's close to the Nova ports in common use (8773, 8774, 8775, and 8776). 

And yes, I'll submit updates to all REST docs, XML docs, devstack, and the code.

So... how many people do I need to worry about murdering me for this next design summit?

-joe

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

______________________________________________________________________
Disclaimer:This email and any attachments are sent in strictest confidence for the sole use of the addressee and may contain legally privileged, confidential, and proprietary data.  If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender by replying promptly to this email and then delete and destroy this email and any attachments without any further use, copying or forwarding