openstack team mailing list archive

[Alex Yang <alex890714@xxxxxxxxx>]

2012/7/6 Alex Yang <alex890714@xxxxxxxxx>

> Hi,
> I have created a new branch named for_keystone2.0 in git@xxxxxxxxxx:
> AlexYangYu/python-cloudfiles.git.
> This branch works fine with keystone v2.0.
>
> import cloudfiles
>
> conn = cloudfiles.get_connection(
>     username='service:swift', api_key='swift',
>     authurl='http://127.0.0.1:5000/v2.0/tokens', auth_version='v2.0'
> )
>
> Why keystone encourage  migrating from port 5000 to port 35357?
> In my opinion, the 5000 is a public endpoint for get tokens, the 35357 is
> an admin endpoint.They may have different security strategy.
> I am familiar with keystone.
>
 I am not familiar with keystone.

>
> 2012/7/6 Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 18:21:48 +0800
>> Alex Yang <alex890714@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > If i want use the cloudfiles with the keystone(the newest version), I
>> need
>> > change the code of cloudfiles by myself?
>>
>> Indeed, clients have to be adapted in cases like yours. However,
>> please look at python-swiftclient. It may be sufficiently similar
>> so you don't need to change much in your application that uses
>> python-cloudfiles.
>>
>> By the way, it was my understanding that Keystone people encourage
>> everyone to migrate from port 5000 to port 35357. The latter is
>> assigned with IANA.
>>
>> -- Pete
>>
>
>
>
> --
>   杨雨
>   Email:       alex890714@xxxxxxxxx
> GitHub:       https://github.com/AlexYangYu
>     Blog:        http://alexyang.sinaapp.com
>  Weibo:       http://www.weibo.com/alexyangyu
>
>


-- 
  杨雨
  Email:       alex890714@xxxxxxxxx
GitHub:       https://github.com/AlexYangYu
    Blog:        http://alexyang.sinaapp.com
 Weibo:       http://www.weibo.com/alexyangyu