← Back to team overview

openstack team mailing list archive

Re: [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

 

On 07/11/2012 09:22 AM, Narayan Desai wrote:
I also vote for option 1, but the migration path really needs to be
solid and well documented.
  -nld

I feel the same. I think documented and tested migration paths are of utmost importance here. Unlike the Keystone -> Keystone Light migration, people are actually using Nova volume in production right now. There were some facilities added in the later Keystone to help with migration, but AFAICS Keystone adoption at the time wasn't to the point where the migration path really mattered--not enough to have any bugs being rasied, at least.

Anyone know if beginnings of such docs and utilities exist currently?

Adam



Follow ups

References